近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
future100
註冊: 2005-05-26
上載我的肖像
|
Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 13 日 |
|
|
does anyone buy FZ30?
because i want to buy, what's comment about this product?
Thanks you!
|
|
|
|
 |
平凡的地夫
註冊: 2005-02-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 13 日 |
|
|
呢度比較少Lumix 用家
因為佢地另外開左個討論區
你可以入去睇睇
|
|
|
|
 |
tam_dominic
註冊: 2002-10-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 13 日 |
|
|
The following link is a detail review of FZ30 with comparisons.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfz30/
|
|
|
|
 |
Victorlolo
註冊: 2005-06-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 13 日 |
|
|
我咪係Fz30用家lor,我好鐘意佢呀,第一部prosumer DC嘛,要彈的是個鏡頭唔夠長,長D左手會揸得好D,PAS mode較小光圈、慢快門時對焦困難(indoor only),個mon會暗左,用M mode就無事,LCD mon顯示較光、要較暗一級才跟真實相片的光度一樣,光圈以F/8最清晰,F/11的話圖像較散(散少少姐不過),Filp LCD mon(船)轉角度不夠,但又足夠應付高低角度拍攝,noise在iso400(尤其室外)太多noise,柤片color有點失真,這是多數prosumerDC的問題...算,我偶爾都用下Neatimage清番D noise架,防震mode 1雖有助對焦準確(遠攝時),但在EVF or LCD的影像會移上移下、移左移右,可謂有好有唔好.除這些以外,其他一切很好!你接受到佢的缺點就一定用得好開心架!
在咩FZ30 question可以再問下我ge
|
|
|
|
 |
wailmw
註冊: 2005-10-14
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 14 日 |
|
|
其實好多人話noise好勁,係咪真係咁難接受呢?!水貨咁平,有d興趣買
|
|
|
|
 |
Victorlolo
註冊: 2005-06-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 14 日 |
|
|
我個人認為iso200還非常可用
|
|
|
|
 |
流星飛豬
註冊: 2003-12-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 14 日 |
|
|
如果有興趣買FZ30既用家,不紡考慮Konika Minitor A200,呢部曾經係prosumer機王,呢部機除左光學變焦比FZ30小之外,其他方面都有過之而無不及(例如粒CCD,A200用2/3",FZ30只係用1.8/1",A200鏡頭則用高級GT鏡等等),而且個價已經跌左好多(喏喏出果陣要六千幾,而家百老匯先賣四千七百幾),仲平過FZ 30。
|
|
|
|
 |
雞能
註冊: 2004-01-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 15 日 |
|
|
>如果有興趣買FZ30既用家,不紡考慮Konika Minitor A200
呢部A200..睇Config係好,
上dpreview睇o下嚇死,
noise ISO400 resize完都仲見到,
成像質素奇低!!! 2/3CCD又點,
長焦又唔夠長.. 半桶水!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
雞能
註冊: 2004-01-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 15 日 |
|
|
>如果有興趣買FZ30既用家,不紡考慮Konika Minitor A200
Focus errors
As mentioned above we found the focus system of the A200 to be just as unreliable as the A2
缺點:
電池3快才夠用
用兩個月馬達燒了,不能對照
剛買兩天時LCD 有兩點死點
AS 不能長期開,很容易燒馬達
對焦真係麻麻,尤其是200mm @
暗環境之下,反應極慢。
電量相對極不足
相片質素相對平平,有一種好soft o既 感覺(有一點似開了數碼變焦一樣),解像度不太充足。
|
|
|
|
 |
雞能
註冊: 2004-01-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 15 日 |
|
|
>如果有興趣買FZ30既用家,不紡考慮Konika Minitor A200
Soft images
As we commented when testing the A2, throughout our samples we found examples of images which just weren't as sharp as we expected.
睇完dpreview先知呢部簡直係垃圾,
忠告各位諗都唔好諗,
|
|
|
|
 |
gapman
註冊: 2002-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 15 日 |
|
|
But I heard many user said A200's photo quality is really good ga wor !
雞能, are you the owner of A200 ??
睇完dpreview先知呢部簡直係垃圾, is that mean if dprview said the DC is "Highly Recommend", then you will go to buy this DC immediately ?? Dpreview just said Sony P200 is highly recommend, but many people in this web don't recommend this DC ga wor ! I think only the user can really know whether their DC is good or not !
|
|
|
|
 |
gzhu
註冊: 2005-09-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 15 日 |
|
|
請問各位大老 Panasonic FZ30 邊度買平d呀 ?
|
|
|
|
 |
jk3666
註冊: 2002-09-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 15 日 |
|
|
water goods, may try coxell, costs about $3980.
|
|
|
|
 |
future100
註冊: 2005-05-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 15 日 |
|
|
where is coxell?
does anything include?(card, foot)
have english or chinese menu?
Thank you
|
|
|
|
 |
hk9991997
註冊: 2003-12-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Panasonic FZ30 Post time: 10 月 16 日 |
|
|
I bought FZ30 from Wan Chai Coxell two weeks ago. There are two version of Water goods. One from Japan ( only Japanese and English menu) but cheaper $3,980 when I bought. The other is Europe version (international version) with lot of the common languages but more expensive $4,180 ) manual and software is not a problem. You can get it from Coxell free of charge. I got the Japanese version and had English manual and software from Coxell. I bet it go down and lower than my price now. go and get one!! It's not that bad. With less than $4,000 dollar, it's the best that I found.
|
|
|
|
 |
|