近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
Ant70s
註冊: 2005-07-21
上載我的肖像
|
EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 21 日 |
|
|
請各位大哥幫幫手
I have a 10-22, but, it seems that at the wide end the image is a bit blur on the edge. What if I switch to 17-40L. 1) will I get a notably better image. 2) I'm using 20D, 17mm Vs 10mm, is it a great different?
I know I can't directlly compare the two lens, since they are not covering the same range, but I really need some insight from experienced photographers.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
mpalex
註冊: 2002-12-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
17-40 is L Lens
buy la, no regret
|
|
|
|
 |
Round
註冊: 2005-04-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
17 vs 10 has big difference.
|
|
|
|
 |
kenkong
註冊: 2005-05-31
上載我的肖像
|
EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
Ant70s 兄,
你話at the wide end the image is a bit blur on the edge,咁你有冇試過將支10-22mm用17mm的焦距影來比較,我估未必會比17-40mm在最wide時(即17mm)差的。
如果只係在wide過17mm的焦段未如你理想,咁你換支17-40mm都係自已搵自已笨(原本有得用10-16mm焦距但唔夠靚,換左就想用都冇得用)。
|
|
|
|
 |
Round
註冊: 2005-04-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
In return he got 23-40. So the fundamental question is whether you are prefer to lost 10-16 or not.
|
|
|
|
 |
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
2).你支係10-22鏡,即刻己經試到10同17差幾遠,駛乜問人.
|
|
|
|
 |
baronng
註冊: 2004-09-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
10-22 係for digital only, right?
17-40L can be use in Full Frame....
可能下一兩年後出部10K FF.....
|
|
|
|
 |
man1492
註冊: 2005-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
"17-40L can be use in Full Frame...."
But it is initially designed for non-FF DSLR. Poor quality found on corners for FF DSLR.
|
|
|
|
 |
Round
註冊: 2005-04-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
可能下一兩年後出部10K FF.....
It's also possible below 10K ff will not happen in 5-years' time.
|
|
|
|
 |
apexi66
註冊: 2004-09-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
keep using 10-22, when FF <10k, then buy the 17-40 law...
|
|
|
|
 |
Ant70s
註冊: 2005-07-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
Thanks all for the advise,
Philippe兄
I know my 10-22 covered 17mm, my question is, will the 17-40 produce better quality picture as a whole.
KenKong兄
Thanks for the advise, this is my main concern,如果只係在wide過17mm的焦段未如你理想,咁你換支17-40mm都係自已搵自已笨(原本有得用10-16mm焦距但唔夠靚,換左就想用都冇得用)。
I heard many Canon user say the 17-40L is a very good lens, so, may be it perform better then the 10-22 at all range. If not, I'll save the money for better lens.
Round 兄
10 vs 17 is a great different, that why I fall into this dilemma - better photo quality vs wider angle
I'm really on a tight budget, only if 17-40L have huge advance in picture quality, I won't sell my 10-22 and get a 17-40L.
|
|
|
|
 |
man1492
註冊: 2005-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
"I'm really on a tight budget, only if 17-40L have huge advance in picture quality, I won't sell my 10-22 and get a 17-40L."
I suggest save it for other lenses.
|
|
|
|
 |
my_M6
註冊: 2003-06-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: EFS 10-22 vs 17-40L Post time: 11 月 25 日 |
|
|
用定焦鏡啦。
|
|
|
|
 |
|