[poontommy2003]

我有部D50 + kit len + 50mm 1.8
想買Zoom len (一定有tele)
如果一鏡走天涯(因有BB，好多野攞，其他自己玩就遲D先想啦)，Nikon AF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G DX VR IF-ED 定 Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC 好呢?
又或有冇咩Suggestion呢?

[tam_dominic]

If money is not your concern, definitely Nikon with VR function is better.

[price_cheat]

"Nikon 18-200mm" - "Sigma 18-200mm"
= AFS + 5.6 at 200mm + VR + ED + extra 25 mm
= HK$3000 ~ HK$4000

Everyone will choose Nikon but Sigma is also very compact (smaller than kit len) with reasonable quality.

[Omega]

價錢差兩三倍wor! 功能規格亦不盡相同﹐
我諗唔係質素的考慮了﹐係你有幾多預算的考慮了

有錢就買NIKON﹐無錢就買SIGMA。

[cheuk373]

SIGMA都約要$2500....
NIKON都係$5800有埋AF-S+VR...
雖然係貴一倍多...但我都覺得值!

[Round]

True, you will have no regret of buying Nikon but you MAY regret of getting Sigma.

[tylau]

唔知兩支成像如何...
因為試過KM支18-200(TAMRON代工)成像唔多掂...

希望NIKON呢支會好D

[Omega]

You will NOT regret to get a Sigma when you need a 18-200 zoom lens
but have no budget for Nikon ($5800+).

This image quality of hyper-zoom lens like these sure can't compare
to the prime lens, no matter it's a Sigma or Nikkor.