近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
Lawrence10034
註冊: 2005-08-08
上載我的肖像
|
DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
我最近聽人講話如果影嘅相喺DC嗰LCD芒度睇有少少曝光,那放入電腦睇就會曝光正常,這是真的嗎﹖為何﹖
|
|
|
|
 |
wongkamfai
註冊: 2005-10-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
當然不是啦!反之應把 DC o既LCD光暗度調低,免出現錯覺。
|
|
|
|
 |
wlachan
註冊: 2004-10-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
Most people's computer aren't calibrated so their monitors appear relatively darker. Uncalibrated CRT is a lot darker than LCD so people got the wrong impression. Unless you had your computor calibrated, you never know if the result is accurate.
|
|
|
|
 |
d2c
註冊: 2005-05-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
會員戶口已被刪除,資料已被標示為不顯示
|
|
|
|
 |
wlachan
註冊: 2004-10-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
Unfortunately, the accuracy of colour depends on both the monitor and the video card.
|
|
|
|
 |
man1492
註冊: 2005-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
"My $3000 LCD colors are more accurate, sharp & vivid than my $17000 IBM Thinkpad laptop 14" 1400x1050 LCD."
I am not surprise, since $17000 is for a whole computer. Get one eizo LCD @ $15000 for so called accurate color.
|
|
|
|
 |
d2c
註冊: 2005-05-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
會員戶口已被刪除,資料已被標示為不顯示
|
|
|
|
 |
流星飛豬
註冊: 2003-12-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
因為如果你部電腦用左D係 2D做得唔好既顯示晶片(特別係nVIDIA),相片會特別黑,有D輸出仲會好模糊(例如S3),如果真係執相用,Matrox出品係最好、次選係ATi。
|
|
|
|
 |
d2c
註冊: 2005-05-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
會員戶口已被刪除,資料已被標示為不顯示
|
|
|
|
 |
小小生
註冊: 2004-04-07
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
DC與電腦個LCD都信唔過,應該以曝光圖為準
|
|
|
|
 |
man1492
註冊: 2005-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 26 日 |
|
|
"係 2D做得唔好既顯示晶片(特別係nVIDIA),相片會特別黑,有D輸出仲會好模糊(例如S3),如果真係執相用,Matrox出品係最好、次選係ATi"
It is related to the digital-to-analog converter on the board rather than the grahpic chipsets.
|
|
|
|
 |
wlachan
註冊: 2004-10-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 27 日 |
|
|
I think it's the overall quality of the graphics card instead of the chip itself. Diamond used to produced excellent video card with vivid colours and they employed nVidia chips. ATi and Matrox have excellent colour because they were designing and producing the cards with high quality, and more expensive too. Most nVidia cards on the markets are from different manufacturers at lower price point and therefore lower quality. But whichever card you use, don't dream of accurate colour or grey balance if not calibrated (Spyder2 is the cheapest option). Uncalibrated display usually have blocked shadow and highlight, and therefore appears more contrasty and darker.
|
|
|
|
 |
kingkonghk
註冊: 2003-01-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 27 日 |
|
|
咩野色先係真色, 原色, 準色, 有人知咩? 影o個時都未必知, 世界上冇絕對準色, 2個人睇2個mon, 2件紅色袗都會唔同感覺
|
|
|
|
 |
wlachan
註冊: 2004-10-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 27 日 |
|
|
Calibration is based on standard and a way to minimize variables. When two computers are properly calibrated, the same picture should display identically. It's scientific, instead of subjective opinion as you implied.
|
|
|
|
 |
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: DC與電腦睇相問題一問 Post time: 12 月 27 日 |
|
|
十部DC有九部個mon都係較到超光,因為消費者喜歡.
|
|
|
|
 |
|