[lazyhero]

其實邊個好一些?有人說SONY的蔡司是假的，只是加上一層野..所以是否fujifilm會好一些?

[six_seven]

其實實際睇samples,睇成像會好過估下呢樣,估下果樣.

Sony 菜絲唔係假,只係菜絲廠同日本Cosina合作代工做鏡,最新出果部菲林機(Zeiss Ikon range finder)o既菜絲鏡,都係Cosina造(ZM mount),只有 Distagon T* 2.8/15mm同Sonnar T* 2/85mm係德國造,其餘都係日本Cosina.

而FujiFilm o既富士龍鏡都唔削,其Xpan(哈蘇)都係佢造.

用心講!係無話邊個靚d,睇買家鍾意影咩多,同時數碼機唔同菲林機,其CCD及其內程式加CPU係好影響成像,所以直接睇影出黎成像會好d!

[wlachan]

其實鏡頭質素支支不同，每個品牌也有好鏡狗鏡，不能一概而論。SONY 蔡司，可能是蔡司設計，日本生產。

[beancurdbean]

仲要睇CCD幾大同鏡頭直徑幾大
一粒"鼻屎"CCD + 5mm 直徑鏡頭, Lecia頂級coating都死.....

[wlachan]

Leica coating 其實唔係特別好。

[beancurdbean]

同意, 所以"Sony 蔡司鏡頭 V.S. FujiFilm 鏡頭", 乜牌子鏡頭?唔多重要

[vaworld]

Carl zeiss唔係邊度造咁簡單, 係基本設計的概念唔同.
"真正" zeiss鏡設計概念係以質素為主, 方便為次. 唔多重視compromise.
你可以睇睇contax lens的 filter size就知.
一支 21/2.8可以用82mm filter, 而 canon 16-35都係用77mm!

不過冇T*就連 coating 都唔同. 真係唔多算係 zeiss.

[wlachan]

All optical designs are about compromise, Carl Zeiss is no difference. And not all Carl Zeiss are first rated compared to other top end Japanese lenses.

[vaworld]

Compromise 係 more or less唔係絕對.

係唔係 first rated又係見仁見智.

[wlachan]

LOL.

[vaworld]

一定 top of the world就未必. 但係每枝鏡都唔會差.
最重要 carl zeiss 真係冇咩"死"鏡(以 contax為例).
就算mij都係唔錯.

好似 n同c公司唔講話平鏡有"死"鏡, 連好多貴鏡都有"死".
死唔係指壞, 係指質素差.

[C8080]

以日本鏡頭來説，奧林巴斯算不錯的。

[wlachan]

>最重要 carl zeiss 真係冇咩"死"鏡(以 contax為例).

LOL.

[vaworld]

"LOL"

呢類態度最乞人憎!

[wlachan]

Because I didn't want to argue with you since you obviously had rigid belief on Carl Zeiss and couldn't see beyond the myth.