[tp0117]

想買以上其中一枝,請比意見, 你地會揀邊枝?

[peterchan04]

full frame (or 1.3x) 要 24-70mm
1.6x 兩枝都吾買.

[beancurdbean]

24-105L IS 輕便更易用到
要大光圈影人就換定焦鏡

[sammyping]

有錢！兩支都買！二選一，24-105多機會用！

[Fluorite]

我最初本都係傾向24-70 f2.8L, 但最後分析過之後都係會揀24-105L, 對比原因如下:

24-105L利方面

1. 對比24-105L 比24-70L 輕左1/3, 焦距長左,可去到105mm比70mm好用好多.

2. 有IS 3級防震.

3. 測試結果全開F4光圈質素好惦, 但24-70L全開f2.8光圈image偏柔, 要收到f4-5.6先ok, 變相大左果級光圈既優勢減弱左.

4. 測試結果24-105L 反差比24-70L高及sharp d, image望落較悅目.

5. 為full frame機度身訂造, 似少聞有focus問題.

6. 非球面鏡片比24-70L還多用一片, 光學質素兩鏡表現相若.



24-70L利方面

1.始終變形及耀光控制方面都係24-70L較佳, 但兩?相差唔大.

2. 大一級光圈觀景較明亮有利手動對焦會方便d.

3. 24-105L須有IS但只能防自已手震, 對凝固移動物体冇幫助,相對這時有大一級光圈會有利.

4. 24-70L 於遠攝端70mm 質素較24-105L好些小.

5. 24-105L f4光圈和 24-70L f2.8大光圈鏡價錢相同, 覺得24-105L價錢算偏高.

[kamchris]

Fluorite:
嘩, 你的比較很中肯. "3. 測試結果全開F4光圈質素好惦, 但24-70L全開f2.8光圈image偏柔, 要收到f4-5.6先ok, 變相大左果級光圈既優勢減弱左." 請問"質素好惦"是指主體sharpness嗎? 如果是, 請問在f4時, 背景化得美嗎(當然不及定焦大光圈)?

[Fluorite]

可以參巧下, 我主要都係睇呢度:
http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/28-105.shtml


i" it’s the 24-105 mm lens on account of higher contrast. The baffle mentioned above appears quite effective. I also feel that f4 is a very practical aperture for this lens, even though it’s then wide open."

"At 24 mm the 70-105 mm lens is definitely better at the edges at f4 and f5.6. This finding is slightly surprising to me as f4 is the maximum aperture for the 24-105 mm lens, whereas the 24-70 mm is stopped down by one stop. By f8 the lenses are hard to tell apart. They are equally good at the centre"

[rickyjumpman]

I just bought the 24-105, and have the same problem with you, since have difficult to make a choice on both lens, but after I test the lens in the shop, I decided to choose 24-105, because the IS and longer range.
After I bought and test it, I no regret that I buy it. Because the image can fulfills me! high contrast, very sharpness, low weight!
The range 24-105 so useful!
otherwise, the aperture 2.8 and 4 , I think you can pulling up the ISO!

http://www.fotop.net/rickyjumpman/rickyjumpman28/I3Y8627R

[tp0117]

多謝各位o既寶貴意見!

[iamjudicator]

兩支L都用過:

24-70L...........廢鏡一支, A09同佢無乜分別, 無謂side錢, 買A09好過, 開盡f2.8時直頭....., 所以我用左一排放埋天....要收光圈先sharp既L鏡, 咁我要泥把鬼!!!大把鏡都做到下話, 又重, hood又大, 叫得標準鏡都成支小白咁大,好無意卻leg出街.........., 如果要型, 要show off, 買佢無死

24-105L, 呢支似翻D"L"樣, 起馬 開盡f4都無問題, 比較支巨mic 24-70L 收到f4重sharp D天, IS都好定下, 又比24-70L 多71-105呢段洗, 要景深淺,24-105L去到105 f4都比24-70L既70 f2.8淺, 不過個價貴到扒街, canon真係on9, 有錢咪買, 無錢就window shopping就算, 無謂下下"L", 出4R相, A09同佢地無分別, 你要下下12R,16R,1000R就自己決定

[beancurdbean]

如果A09唔係28mm, 如果有24mm對canon?係好惡

[kamchris]

就iamjudicator所言的"要景深淺,24-105L去到105 f4都比24-70L既70 f2.8淺", 好想看看相片如何淺景深, 請問各位哪裡可以找到24-105L f4的攝影成品? 小弟都對24-105L心動, 但要等到合適價位 -_-""

[McDonald]

我都好想買支24-105L。我上網check過日本果邊好幾間鋪原本賣11萬Yen而家都加o左價賣12萬Yen，重要冇貨。我已經等o左好耐，我上網check新年前日本果邊曾經有段時間有過貨賣，但正想出手之際佢又out of stock喇。呢支鏡實在太搶手，連日本果邊都係咁。睇o黎想呢支鏡減價都好難。

[iamjudicator]

TO:kamchris, 要上電, 無忌大把貨, 叉夠電再入貨, 小心冼親!!!
24-105L
http://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=310915

[domusren]

想問現在Canon EF24-105 f4.0 L 賣緊多少錢？