[andyfive]

小弟一家三口下個月將會去澳洲九天旅行,頭五天是鴨仔團,四天自由行.心絲絲想買多支鏡去影相(budget : 6k).

現小弟現有器材如下:
350d+kit lens+50 f1.8+70-200 f4
casio EX-750 (用作snap shot及DV之用)

方案如下:
1) 賣掉那支70-200 f4L, 買支24-105 4L+kit lens.
(原因 - 因為那支70-200 f4L發覺很少用,買了一年左右,只用上十次八次.)
2) 只買一支17-85 f4-5.6 IS USM,索性一鏡走天涯.

註:因要照顧小朋友,所以想輕便一點!

煩各位師兄給點指引.
!!!happy shooting!!!

[kingkonghk]

方案1 好d

[jpl]

方案2
旅行帶幾支鏡去都冇乜用
最後都係用死一支鏡

[呀超]

去旅行主要影景，最好有支 10 - 22。

如果唔係發燒友，70 - 200 唔使帶。

[Philippe]

方案2
旅行帶得太重會好幸苦,帶支外閃好過.

[wlachan]

反正也不是攝影人，DSLR 買買賣賣實在無謂，何不賣清所有，然後買部 Panasonic prosumer。

[小班長ErikoB]

第時仔仔運動會 and(筆枼)禮果陣.枝f4好有用ga.
買多枝17-85帶去用萛 la

[wlachan]

唉，新手就已經換機換鏡，到時都唔知咩世界，邊有咁長遠吖。

[beancurdbean]

Kit 換17-85 IS, 一鏡走天涯, 旅行一流

[kohg]

我比較贊同beancurdbean的 Kit 換17-85 IS
70~200 f/4 有佢一定的存在價值(其實都叫輕了一半,對比f/2.8)
不過一家人去旅行又的確好難話帶好重的鏡...

[pingu_hk]

buy sigma 18-200 if u don't mind edge softness, center is ok. It's very light weight. Image quality is a little worst than kit lens.

[Round]

if you already have the 70-200 probably you can't accept the quality of the Sigma 18-200. Especially you use it for a trip which I believe you will like to have more "keepers".

I agree with the others that 70-200 has its value especially you have a kid (although I am not sure how old is he).

If you don't think you will upgrade to FF, go for a 17-85 otherwise I think 17-40L is a good choice (similar price range).

[Philippe]

旅行影相最緊要快,唔好阻太多時間,大多數情況冇機會用腳架,防震是必需的.

[Gowest]

鴨仔團都係snap shot居多,根本冇需要換鏡,用番枝kit lens咪得囉,買多張2gb SD咭拍多d video仲好啦。再講你果幾枝鏡放都唔會好值錢,除非你覺得阻地方另計。

[andyfive]

!!!先多謝各師兄回覆!!!

看過各位的post後,自己都好想用方案2).因為第一小小白可以留待個仔大咗用,另外賣掉又不是太多錢.但我都再想知17-85 4-5.6 IS USM那支質素如何呢?!因小弟覺得kit lens的確差了一點.很多時間都有唔sharp的情況出現.我都看過其他網站的資訊,都話17-85 4-5.6 IS USM只比kit lens質素好一點,多了IS罷了.故此我才想買那支24-105 f4.因我用過小小白.L鏡的威力又的確有很大的分別.

多謝繼續支持及回覆
!!!happy shooting!!!