[Skywalker.]

其實應該將防震設計在鏡頭(如 Nikon VR 鏡), 定係設計在機身好(好似Sony A100 咁? )

[karry]

[quote]其實應該將防震設計在鏡頭(如 Nikon VR 鏡), 定係設計在機身好(好似Sony A100 咁? ) [/quote]

你做乜唔提膠囊.告你品牌歧視.:)
其實唔加質素最好,不過d膠火雞人鍾意.唔數咪要埋.支支鏡加買貴d係硬膠設計.

[Skywalker.]

"不過d膠火雞人鍾意.唔數咪要埋.支支鏡加買貴d係硬膠設計." --> 唔知你講mud! 可唔可以表達得好d?

[IloveKodachrome]

大家都係技術交流, 唔好做埋d on 9 既事啦.

我想講既係, 兩種都可行既, 不過睇機種, 好多字, 我用英文方便d:

(1) for DC of non-dslr / not do viewfinding through penta-prism:
(1a) building stabilizer in (body) can facilitate image stabilization during viewfinding and capturing;
(1b) building stabilizer in (lens) can facilitate image stabilization during viewfinding and capturing;

(2) for DC of dslr / do viewfinding through penta-prism:
(2a) building stabilizer in (body) can facilitate image stabilization during capturing but cannot facilitate image stabilization during viewfinding;
(2b) building stabilizer in (lens) can facilitate image stabilization during capturing and viewfinding.

我諗大家都係睇左sony既新dslr所以有感而發, 我亦都有興趣, 不過一諗到依一點就有d 疑問, (3) 我既logic 係咪arm呢? (4) sony 新機用既lenes sharp唔sharp得過nikon既組合呢?

另外, (5) 我對鏡頭認識唔多, 高手們可唔可以comment一下 leica, 蔡司, nikon, canon 鏡既成像分別呢? ((6)如果單以傳統相機時代同成像角度出發既話; 因為, 鏡頭係輸入image既第一級system element, 如果佢有問題, 之後既elements點好都已經被limited左喇.)

[Canasony]

Skywalker. : 表達能力同智商....可能係成正比的 xD

[karry]

Canasony
表達能力同智商....可能係成正比的 xD

:-x :-x :-x 咁q低IQ就唔好搭咀

[Skywalker.]

Borischk

無錯,我係睇左Sony新dslr A100 所以有感而發. Sony 呢一次"踩"隻腳入 Dslr 市場, 作為消費者, 未嘗不是一個好先兆.

Sony 強項係 marketing. 仲記得當年 Playstation 既故事吧? (任天堂一定估計不到會大阿哥會被取代吧!)

Anyway, Sony 既介入, Nikon 同 Canon 一定會出多d好既同有競爭力既產品.

[jjboy]

Sony 既介入, Nikon 同 Canon 一定會出多d好既同有競爭力既產品 = 益晒我地D 用家^_^

[老叟]

車,,,C,N,睬你都傻啦,小巫同大巫,根本班數陣容都唔同,不過呢,嘩眾取寵呢招喎,咪俾你地威下囉!