7 月 16 日 (星期三) | 會員登記|會員中心
吹水閒聊
近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1共 4 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

bo law tau




註冊: 2006-07-29

上載我的肖像
題目VR len is better than no VR ? Big different??     Post time: 8 月 16 日

i know some lens have VR ..such as Nikon 18-200mm have VR...
but i want but tamron 28-300mm on 5D but it havent VR...., if i use tamron , will some problem ???
Back to top

cookiemerry




註冊: 2004-01-26

上載我的肖像
題目Re: VR len is better than no VR ? Big different??     Post time: 8 月 16 日

VR(nikon) = vibration reduction =OIS(panasonic) =IS(canon) =AS(KM)
If you do not use a tripod VR is better.
It save you carrying a tripod
With VR/IS I can easily take photo using 1/20 shutterspeed(sometimes even slower) without blur image at full zoom.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

edng




註冊: 2002-12-31

上載我的肖像
題目Re: VR len is better than no VR ? Big different??     Post time: 8 月 16 日

But Nikon 18-200mm VR also have AF-S. That's mean this lens speed is faster than Tamron or Sigma 18-200mm.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

bo law tau




註冊: 2006-07-29

上載我的肖像
題目Re: VR len is better than no VR ? Big different??     Post time: 8 月 16 日

i use tamron 28-300 mm for tavel . no tripot.....that will so easy to hand shake??
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

cookiemerry




註冊: 2004-01-26

上載我的肖像
題目Re: VR len is better than no VR ? Big different??     Post time: 8 月 16 日

Only at high zoom or low shutter, really depend how stable your hand is and the environment. You need to try it out yourself when you have time, to know your own limits ( just use shutter piroity on your camera to set different speed to try)

That is why I like to use a Panasonic or Minolta prosumer with VR when traveling
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1共 4 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: