近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
salt
註冊: 2002-10-17
上載我的肖像
|
<<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
想買 V3 好耐喇. .........
|
|
|
|
 |
fai26
註冊: 2002-12-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
我都想知質素係咪真係比其他3M auto DC好
但兩倍zoom就一定係
|
|
|
|
 |
cfkw
註冊: 2002-12-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
Its pic quality is quite ok. Also the 640X480 movie is outstanding.No difference to good DV video camera. However its problem is that the user would get bored with it quite easily as it s a quite auto point & shoot camera.
|
|
|
|
 |
DCDennis
註冊: 2002-12-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
V3是否真的比其他細機好就不太肯定,因我只用過V3可同菲林單鏡機。但以我的個人數碼經驗(不愉快),最好都買架CCD較大的DC(如1/1.8"或2/3")。CCD太細,Noise會很勁,而且鏡頭的缺點如色散,球面像差等等都會一同放大。
不過如果要求不高,只當傻瓜機用,照片都OK的,只是色散較嚴重。
|
|
|
|
 |
cfkw
註冊: 2002-12-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
DCDennis made an excellent point. It s limited by the size of its CCD.
Personally, I won't buy a Sony DC and I like my V3. However you must admit that even P5/P7(comparable products to V3) make better pics than V3.
|
|
|
|
 |
fai26
註冊: 2002-12-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
P5/P7 make better pics than V3? isn't it?
but actually why don't u buy P5/P7 instead of V3? the price is the same and seems that function is more.
and I would like to ask that what is meaning of CCD size 1/1.8, 1/2.7, 2/3?
how is it calculated?
Thx so much!
|
|
|
|
 |
gapman
註冊: 2002-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
Forget about Sony's DC la ! I never consider Sony's DC !
|
|
|
|
 |
fai26
註冊: 2002-12-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
gapman兄, 唔係challenge你既意見
但係咪只係你偏見?
凡事要從事實睇好喎
|
|
|
|
 |
d.leung
註冊: 2002-12-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
fai26 參考下面資料
http://www.dcfever.com/forum/read.php?f=1&i=41030&t=41030
|
|
|
|
 |
chanraymond3
註冊: 2002-11-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
優點:
型 (外觀)
靚 (外觀, 相片質素)
細 (外觀)
正 (相片質素)
人景 / 外景 / 室內景的色溫都好好
焛燈夠強
夜景靚, NR做得好, 影函館夜景用ISO100/快門 2s無雲花, 好清
白平衡做得好
一粒電可以用成日 (9hr)
細細部外出影相好方便, 掛頸或放衫袋都得
配128MB CF卡(約$200)可以影140多張
-10度都可以正常運作 (部機用完放返入內袋)
缺點:
只有2x光學
無電量顯示
無手動光圈/快門
|
|
|
|
 |
cfkw
註冊: 2002-12-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
Those CCD sizes are in inches. And they are vertical dimension (correct me if I am wrong ). So 2/3 > 1/2.7. In general,
bigger sensor ==>
1. smaller focal length multiplier
2. less diffraction
3. less fuzzy picture when stop down aperture
4. better Signal/Noise Ratio ( of course it depends of CCD type)
thus ==> preferred pictures
I don't buy sony because there are too many people after that brand name. It s my personal prehudice.
|
|
|
|
 |
gapman
註冊: 2002-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
Hi Fai26. You are right. I am bias and don't like Sony DC ! Especially for P series ! IF you say F series, I can say that it is good ! I know that Sony's CCD is really good ! But for the lens........... You know ! If their lens is good, then why they use other brands lens in F series ? And the most important thing is they are too expensive ! IF you use money to buy "Hong" P9, I am sure people will say you better buy Canon G2 la !
|
|
|
|
 |
chanraymond3
註冊: 2002-11-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
係呀, sony出品都有一定品質保証, 例如dv我會選買sony, 因為sony可以配一舊3hr的電池 (一般跟機電池只可以1hr)
不過, 相似規格的dc產品, sony都會買得比人貴, 功能又比人少一些, 若果我係識擇和識用dc的, 點解唔省一點錢買其他補品給部相機呢?
|
|
|
|
 |
fai26
註冊: 2002-12-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
唔該哂cfkw, d.leung, gapman and chanraymond3
但冇錯sony行係貴一千, 但DCC水貨同其他牌子一樣
水貨made in Japan
又係咪冇乜輸蝕呢?
|
|
|
|
 |
fai26
註冊: 2002-12-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: <<請講 V3 有咩好同壞處>> Post time: 1 月 7 日 |
|
|
DCC sony水貨價同其他牌子一樣I mean
|
|
|
|
 |
|