近日收到不少網友意見，指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站，此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論，並正密切留意事態的發展。
| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
BABA168
註冊: 2006-02-16
上載我的肖像
|
 EF 17-40F/4.0 L VS EFS 17-85 F-5.6 Post time: 10 月 16 日 |
|
|
|
which one better ??
|
|
|
|
 |
man1492
註冊: 2005-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: EF 17-40F/4.0 L VS EFS 17-85 F-5.6 Post time: 10 月 16 日 |
|
|
|
no doubt, 17-40 f/4L is definitely much better. 17-85 is only good for its range.
|
|
|
|
|
dickyyim
註冊: 2006-03-23
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: EF 17-40F/4.0 L VS EFS 17-85 F-5.6 Post time: 10 月 16 日 |
|
|
|
你想比較D咩先?
|
|
|
|
|
BABA168
註冊: 2006-02-16
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: EF 17-40F/4.0 L VS EFS 17-85 F-5.6 Post time: 10 月 16 日 |
|
|
for travel
and human pic
|
|
|
|
|
kariscat
註冊: 2004-11-14
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: EF 17-40F/4.0 L VS EFS 17-85 F-5.6 Post time: 10 月 17 日 |
|
|
你想要品質或方便先?
隻我定不定?
如我就會要17-85is
因旅行方便好多!is 3級救到命!
加多支10-22就完美了
17-40L 用 1.6 X到喉唔到肺, 除了 可用Film機及 L 外就沒優點了~~
FF DSLR 小弟冇$$
Film SLR 已很少玩
L ~~~有長鏡了
|
|
|
|
|
korea
註冊: 2004-09-21
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: EF 17-40F/4.0 L VS EFS 17-85 F-5.6 Post time: 10 月 17 日 |
|
|
I have both lens.
Quality of 17-85 not good enough, dark corners, not high resolution...
17-40 a very good quality lens. When fitted to DLSR, almost cover the most usual range for travel photo.
I took 17-40 and 85, 1.8 during my last trip to Japan in August this year. Excellent package for scenery and protrait. But a bit heavy, can be without 85, 1.8 if you count the weight.
someone said it is not a big deal to carry with both lens? If you travel on your own, you will know the difference. But if you join tour, forget it.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
