[goolman]

Tarmon 70-300mm Di鏡有微距，價錢都好平，有無兄弟買左，請發表下意見！

[小小新]

今日行過成成，新鏡行貨賣$1480，舊貨賣$1280，但先達水貨新貨賣$1080，平價鏡好似買水低D，質素影相在電腦看都幾好，好清晰

[isaacmad]

TAMRON and SIGMA 70-300mm
which is better?

[wolfchau]

兩支邊支好d 我唔知.....我相信無人同時有晒兩支卦........不過 sigma 有 "增
值" 功能.....可以做到全焦段微距...........

[老叟]

各人品味唔同,好難講邊支好,個人偏愛龍記多D,起碼有Di數碼鍍膜,係比較清澈D!!!!

[di see]

To wolfchau :
Is it correct << 不過 sigma 有 "增值" 功能.....可以做到全焦段微距........... >> ??

Refer to the link " http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/lens/telezoom/70_300_4_56_macro.htm ", the low cost 70-300mm zoom len also has a switch for changeover to macro photography at focal lengths between 200mm and 300mm with a maximum close-up magnification from 1:2.9 to 1:2.SLD (Special Low Dispersion) glass in this lens provides excellent correction of chromatic aberration.

Happy Shooting ~.~

[beeboy]

好熱鬧！我就鍾意肥龍，因為62mm我有好多濾鏡可以用番，唔洗買，如果係死馬就要買58mm濾鏡，我一片都無。

[wolfchau]

To : di see

sigma 支 70-300 當你去左300mm 開左微距後....用少少陰力扭返過200mm 果邊....當你完成左匿個壯舉就可以全焦段都有微距喇......

[bkfchung]

我兩枝鏡都用過，現有Sigma果枝賣左，我比較過這兩枝鏡有以下心得：

1)龍仔比較輕。
2)龍仔比較高解像度。
3)Sigma做工比較習實，龍仔膠感重。
4)龍仔的Marco範圍比較廣，在180-300mm (Sigma在200-300mm)。
5)龍仔的短些少。

以前我末用過龍仔鏡，近來因為菲林相而買了兩枝，發覺龍仔鏡的質素相當唔錯，在光學技術方面絕對比Sigma好，有些像Nikon鏡。

[goolman]

多謝提供意見，仲有無兄弟有意見發表下

[chichim_lee]

好..........就聽師兄意見.......今日去買TAMRON 70-300先