[DSLRer]

早前見過有位前輩話 >>>>

>>>> 見親收費攝影師影晚宴合照都係用17-55DX, 24-70L之類
更有甚者T17-50, S17-70這些劣鏡都夠膽死出來呃錢, 唔通個攝影世界已經冇專業呢回事?
又>>見過有人收錢用D70去影啦....問你怕未??


咁推論咩係用高級器材先可以做專業收費攝影師????

[Gowest]

所以影晚宴根本唔需要請人,分分鐘你套架生仲靚過佢,除非冇一個人有相機咁就冇計

再講,呢d"埋位"相搵你影同請人影有幾大分別先,你d姨媽姑姐會唔會care?

[QQboy]

I don't think so

[QQboy]

I mean 用高級器材先可以做專業收費攝影師

I don't think so

[vaworld]

睇影咩晚宴啦.

影大機構 official 晚宴, 唔係經驗豐富一定影唔掂.

朋友專影呢d, 絕對唔簡單.

[mochida]

有d人可能會咁諗，除左請人影相，仲可以請到一堆高級器材黎影相

[vaworld]

器材係比請攝影師的人個老頂睇.

呢個係現實.

就如好多 ball, 個老攝要著全套 "踢死套" 先至入得去影一樣.

[肚腩仔]

影晚宴, 影結婚o既攝影師係咪專業 ? 唔係用器材黎定 ~~~~
只係經驗已冇得比 ~~~

係晚宴時 ~~~ 要o既相唔係話 Sharp ~~~ 色水靚等等 ~~~
係要o係適當時候影到適當o既野 ~~~~ 交到功課為先 ~~~~
器材o既野 ~~~ 足夠就算了 ~~~~

[Deesigner]

As a professional photographer (whatever type). "Use the right tool for the right job" not "use the best tool for any job".

In fact the best 晚宴合照攝影師影is not only take photos. They know how to photo shooting every guests in a cordial atmosphere.

[vaworld]

Deeisgner, u're correct.

[QQboy]

To : Deeisgner

I lov'in yr word..........
As a professional photographer (whatever type). "Use the right tool for the right job" not "use the best tool for any job".

[goolman]

影相唔一定買用貴價器材去衡量佢專唔專業，當然佢收你$4000-$5000，用D平價器材又有D唔係幾像樣，其實六百萬象素D70影相出黎都唔差，但係同樣係六百萬像素D100，你就會覺得佢專業好多，因為佢架相機貴左幾千蚊的關係。可能兩部機影出黎都係一樣，其實影結婚相（講真都係交行貨嗟）

器材不是太重要，經驗最緊要。

例如：如果影結婚相，D相扁黃，有嘜辦法可解決（不可以後期用電腦解決）

[DSLRer]

其實見過都好多副手用 D50, D80, 400D 之類影 snapshot

只要佢捕捉得好先最重要

而主力果D, 都見過有 Tokina / Tamron 等

反而同學果次有個主力用C記菲林一系加 28-70L

又變形又偏色, 都唔知佢點搵食

[Rol]

Some video + photo packaging service is very cheap, if complaint that they do not use top equirpment, firstly pls see how much paying them...

Last week I saw at a wedding the professional photogragher using D80 + 17-135 kit only + SB800.

17-135 kit missing lens hood all time, SB800 without additional bounce card at indoor, all photo was shoot at jpg.

[vaworld]

其實係人都知經驗技術最重要.

但係商業社會講包裝.

正如好多公司要升到某個職位, 你做得野係唔夠.
好多時你老闆會同你講不如你讀番個mba先.

當然齋有器材/學歷但無能又係另一件事.