[hsc]

機身防震會否沒落呢?

[yung2]

可能越來越流行都唔定呢? 至少DC仔好需要機身防震...

[Snow Pig]

緊係唔會啦，因為機身防震平，所以好易捉到市場需要，但當然有利亦有弊啦。
有d人覺得唔需要或者使用鏡身防震的品牌，但無防震的價錢差不多的話，不如就買多一個功能，亦都有一定的程度有用。
鏡身防震分分鏡都能一支鏡格錢就買到一個機身防震的單反機。
而且連nikon都出機身防震的相機！不過係dc仔，成本平呀！

[老叟]

車,我話人肉防震仲好!!

[henry98822496]

dc仔有防震好正, 用過canon850is同panasonic fx30, 影夜景都得

[b_kid]

鏡身防震會否沒落呢?

又貴又不是支支有，只有無良生產商才諗到。

[TommyYan]

掉轉去睇就差唔多, 當機身防震既技術再成熟 D, 枝枝鏡話知你長短移軸 MACRO, 都可手持多三級快門, 個 D 貴價 IS 鏡就拜拜 !

NIKON 家下都出平既 VR KIT LEN 啦, 係 CAN0N 重一味搶錢之麻 !

[b_kid]

N, C 出了咁多 VR, IS 鏡，只是勢成騎虎，唔肯認衰......

其他牌子無呢個包"服"，現在連 OM 都出機身防震，DSLR 市場上相信只有 N, C "唔敢"出，N, C 如果出機身防震，d VR, IS 鏡點收科？

[mangrovetree]

玩下手，過一兩年，當C/N清哂貨倉入面的IS/VR鏡，就突然間出機身防震BODY哩 ~

[hsc]

機身防震,在長焦鏡,micro 鏡上吾係好得
dlsr還有用嗎

[kingkonghk]

micro幫助唔大

[b_kid]

>>> 機身防震,在長焦鏡,micro 鏡上吾係好得

何以見得？
原理一樣，為何長焦鏡,micro 鏡上吾係好得？

micro 鏡吾得首先要分清楚係 out focus 定手震先！

用 micro 焦點可能得 1-2mm，只要影時郁一郁，焦點便可能移位，令主體唔清。

你咁講， 300mm F2.8 IS 應該都吾係好得......

[wyngo]

機身防震 have it's benefit, but Nikon point out some 鏡身防震 features which is not easily replace by 機身防震: http://nikonimaging.com/global/technology/vr/index.htm

1. VR lens can produce much more stable view in the view finder
2. VR lens lead to fast focusing speed
3. When using single point exposure metering, VR lens can ensure precise exposure metering

I do agree those points, for point 3, i think bosy anti-shake can do the job, but how about point 1 & 2? Canon's live view cmos?

Even more, can 機身防震 apply to a full frame body?

Just sharing, have fun!

[tungtungli]

如果鏡身防震 有100分
機身防震 有80分
但價錢貴許多
I think most people will choose 機身防震.
"Price is impostant for most people"
But I think Nikon will make the VR lens just make up 10-20% compare with the lens without VR
or VR become a standand in one or two years.

[tungtungli]

鏡身防震 賺大錢的年代 will be hostory
Canon and Nikon are same