[FS8497]

AF-S 28-70mm f/2.8D IF-ED大家覺得值買嗎?
$10000的價錢.......

[jackytongtong]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[大頭民]

請問師兄用什麼機身？？

[Cankon]

有錢，唔怕重，film+digital兩棲，就一定要買！

[teddykwan]

大三元中最差便是這支28-70
我用24,35,50,85四支定焦取代左佢.
四支加起上黎都吾過皮.質素高好多.

[FS8497]

我係新手,用緊d80,有支70-300mm vr
想買支70mm內o既鏡,睇各位師兄有咩介紹?
仲有想問下閃光燈究竟sb600定sb800好呢?

[tonyting]

af 24-85 f2.8/4 d , good choice, price:3750

[Stchau]

Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5 MACRO
New hong good ~ $2800

Very good budget buy
can cover wide angle as well
relatively large aperture(compare to stand 3.5-5.6)
good image quality(for its price)
And have Marco!(1:2.3)

Highly recommend!

[大頭民]

我都用D80 28-70f/2.8 我都喜歡 不過剛買了70-200 要遲d先

閃燈買sb800喇 貴少少 但好好多......

[Rol]

28-70 is less than 17-35 and 70-200.. But this not bad, color and brokeh are good.

If compare PQ to prime lens, not just 28-70, 17-35 and 70-200 can bye bye too..

[kanji]

"""我用24,35,50,85四支定焦取代左佢.
四支加起上黎都吾過皮.質素高好多. ""

絕對同意, 四支加起來(24f2.8, 35 f2, 50f1.8, 85f1.8), 可能等於一支 28-70 f2.8. 但質素一定好過佢.

[Xplore]

Zoom 鏡係買佢不用換鏡的方便

而有質素的 Zoom 鏡, 可拍著定焦

本是兩種用法

又何須並為一談呢

[Rol]

28-70 is less than 17-35 and 70-200..
----

mistake : I meant 28-70 less SHARP than 17-35 / 70-200

[Xplore]

而 AF-S 28-70mm f/2.8D IF-ED 在數碼機上確唔夠 wild

Tele 唔夠可行前兩步, wild 唔夠就................

可以考慮 17-55mm f2,8