[haha1969]

cp 5700 樣本照片質素麻麻，唔知大家有無同感?
部機質素好似差過717, g3 and 5050!!!!!!!!!!，仲諗住買呢部 tim，唉!!!!

[dianelo]

"樣本照片"質素麻麻唔等於部機麻麻
唔同機既樣本照片影既setting完全唔同, 影既野又唔同, 根本不能作比較, 只可參考.

[EEC]

No!

Pls look at the new magazine on Nikon Coolpix. The picture of 5700 is very good.

[ronald]

嘩haha1969, 你係咪有機放呀?你覺得cp5700唔好, 賣比我啦, $6800

[Velsper]

雖然不知道你在那裡看samples
但小弟覺得5700絕不比G3/5050差
(測試者也會有影響的)
不如再多看幾張,再下論吧~~

[vgar]

呢位兄台都好主觀喎 , 有無諗過除了相機機能之外 , 拍攝者功力都係好重要一環 ?

如果影相功力差 , 用部機皇EOS 1Ds 咪一樣影出垃圾.......

你話 D Sample 質素唔惦 , 不如 post 上黎睇下呢.

[haha1969]

sample is from here, i think the picture is not sharp and focus is not accurate.

[haha1969]

http://www.dcfever.com/gallery/viewphoto.php?galleryID=114

[jackngai]

哈 ~~ 唔係化 ~~
你睇清楚d ~~張相o既焦點係朵花咋 ~ 後面d 葉朦少少, 係因為有少少淺景深效果呀..........

你留意下, 佢雖然用到 F5.9 光圈, 但因為zoom 盡 280mm, 所以景深係會有少少淺架 ~~

[manphew]

to vgar

本人有小小主觀 (請不要罵我...謝謝)

我個人覺得 機皇EOS 1Ds 真係一部垃圾呀!
o的色好淡, 成六萬元, 5700一定好過機皇,
買機要買畫質,
可能真係 CMOS 和 CCD 的分別

[vgar]

manphew , 傻啦 , 我點解要罵你 ? 我又唔係幫 Canon 打工 (雖然以前係) , 咁各人有不同意見 , 互相傾下咁先可以多多交流/學習嘛 ^_^

實質上 , 1Ds 我都未親身玩過 , 而我相信 5700 係一部唔差的相機.

[vgar]

不如睇多少少樣本先.
http://www.dcview.com.tw/gallery/showlist.asp?SearchItem=5700&but1=Next&page=1

死火 , 頭先話haha1969主觀 , 咁其實我都好主觀偏幫5700 , 講錯野 Sorry ^_^

[haha1969]

one more site

http://home.impress.co.jp/magazine/digitalcamera/03_01/t1_hkk/index.htm

the picture quality, the best one is 5050 and 717 excluding other performance

[haha1969]

to be honest, after viewing all the sample pictures, i do think that 717 and 5050 got the better picture. But the 8x zoom is so attractive for me. Actually, i prefer to buy 5700, but..................................

[GeoffKwok]

haha1969, Check this web site. This guy took photos w/ CP5700 and the quality of the photos is extremely HIGH.

I believe if you are good at photography and 100% fully know the features and control of CP5700, you can take photos as good as he can. Of course, it's hard to find beautiful scenes in HK as other countries.

Site:
http://homepage.mac.com/johnwoodruff/PhotoAlbum4.html