近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
maximilianyuen
註冊: 2006-02-11
上載我的肖像
|
PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
my question is simple
should I store my best photo in PNG or TIFF?
jpg is lossy, and PNG & TIFF are lossless
but the point PNG have SMALLER file size compare with TIFF
yet most photographer and photo software by default is choosing TIFF rather then PNG???
so anyone know whats the advantage of TIFF over PNG?
because I am going to delete all the RAW pic and convert to PNG or TIFF once and for all....
so I hope I didn't make an wrong decision ....
thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
william_lau
註冊: 2007-02-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
PNG並唔係for專業用途,佢主要目的係想o係internet度取代gif format,所以好多專業editing唔夠tiff(如png唔supoort CMYK),詳情你可以去WIKI睇,我copy一段畀你參考︰
Comparison with TIFF (png vs tiff)
TIFF is a complicated format that incorporates an extremely wide range of options. While this makes TIFF useful as a generic format for interchange between professional image editing applications, it makes adding support for it to applications a much bigger task and so it has little support in applications not concerned with image manipulation (such as web browsers). It also means that many applications can read only a subset of TIFF types, creating more potential user confusion.
The most common general-purpose, lossless compression algorithm used with TIFF is LZW, which is inferior to PNG and, until expiration in 2003, suffered from the same patent issues that GIF did. There is a TIFF variant that uses the same compression algorithm as PNG uses, but it is not supported by many proprietary programs. TIFF also offers special-purpose lossless compression algorithms like CCITT Group IV, which can compress bilevel images (e.g., faxes or black-and-white text) better than PNG's compression algorithm.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics
|
|
|
|
 |
maximilianyuen
註冊: 2006-02-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
Thanks, I still don't understand :P
but guess on this matter I can follow the majority:)
|
|
|
|
 |
kingkonghk
註冊: 2003-01-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
冇1架dc係影cmyk架喎, 軟件開到的話, png同tiff分別唔大
|
|
|
|
 |
maximilianyuen
註冊: 2006-02-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
O?
so for only STORAGE use, PNG is sufficient right??
because I read somewhere that PNG is the best for vector graphic....
and saying a lot that TIFF have what "icc profile" which png don't..
I just want to store my photo lossless.....
just like storing music in ape/flac/wav rather then lossy mp3/wma...
|
|
|
|
 |
kingkonghk
註冊: 2003-01-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
用來上網, 或者一般曬相, 冇所謂, 咁在意就不如用raw
|
|
|
|
 |
maximilianyuen
註冊: 2006-02-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
um...thanks for the answer
decided...
png for normal photo and tiff for edited photo...
|
|
|
|
 |
kam
註冊: 2002-06-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
自己可以做個測試
TIFF轉PNG
PNG轉TIFF
我鍾意將Raw轉TIFF,用來曬相都得
|
|
|
|
 |
MN56
註冊: 2003-10-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
PNG is lossless but compressed.
TIFF has not compressed.
So, the image quality is :TIFF > PNG.
|
|
|
|
 |
maximilianyuen
註冊: 2006-02-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
TIFF轉PNG
PNG轉TIFF
tried...really can't tell the diff
Raw -> PNG
Raw ->Tiff -> PNG
both PNG are the same
Raw->Tiff
Raw->PNG-> Tiff
both Tiff are the same too(file size,exactly the same )
|
|
|
|
 |
d2c
註冊: 2005-05-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
會員戶口已被刪除,資料已被標示為不顯示
|
|
|
|
 |
kingkonghk
註冊: 2003-01-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 22 日 |
|
|
有compress唔=有loss
|
|
|
|
 |
d2c
註冊: 2005-05-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: PNG vs TIFF Post time: 1 月 23 日 |
|
|
會員戶口已被刪除,資料已被標示為不顯示
|
|
|
|
 |
|