近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
manson5230
註冊: 2008-01-19
上載我的肖像
|
450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@
大家都係DIGIC III ....
各師兄俾點意見吧~~!
|
|
|
|
 |
Tester 1
註冊: 2006-04-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
"敗"為目標!必以最貴為依歸!
記住唔貴唔好買啦!
|
|
|
|
 |
jackytongtong
註冊: 2006-12-17
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
會員戶口已被刪除,資料已被標示為不顯示
|
|
|
|
 |
cy001
註冊: 2007-08-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
u ask this question too early. nobody tried 450D. how to give u idea? ^^
|
|
|
|
 |
twheddie
註冊: 2007-08-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
40D的凁度和機身強度,對焦設計,手感,尊業感,勝過450d,且可換對焦片.
|
|
|
|
 |
scwong
註冊: 2004-10-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
But, the 450D resoultion is higher then 40D, the number of focus points are equal, live view may better then 40D, 450D body will become more professional, etc
|
|
|
|
 |
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
邊個話對焦系統一樣架,450D得中間一點係十字,40D有9點的.
|
|
|
|
 |
scwong
註冊: 2004-10-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
I mean number of focus point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
|
|
|
|
 |
cy001
註冊: 2007-08-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
but the live view of 450d is better than 40d.
|
|
|
|
 |
scwong
註冊: 2004-10-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
Yes, I said before.
The different between 450d & 40d is very small, and also part of the function is better then 40d such as live view, resoultion, cost, etc.
|
|
|
|
 |
manson5230
註冊: 2008-01-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
各c兄~!
想問 40d 個"9點十字型對焦點" 同 450d 個 "9 點自動對焦,中央點為 f/2.8 十字型"
有咩分別??@@
|
|
|
|
 |
scwong
註冊: 2004-10-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
The main different:
- Look like more "professional"
May be someone will say the noise is less then 450d, but I think sometime you can't easy to see the different. On the other hand, fps for 40d is faster than 450d, but, I want to know how many people need a faster fps? How many time you need a faster fps?
|
|
|
|
 |
scwong
註冊: 2004-10-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
十字型 focus point will more accuracy. (If take photo within a lower light envirnment)
|
|
|
|
 |
scwong
註冊: 2004-10-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
十字型 focus point will more accuracy. (If take photo within a lower light environment, you can easy to see the different)
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 450d vs 40d 敗邊部好...@@ Post time: 1 月 28 日 |
|
|
For 40D ALL 9 points focusing points are cross type it can be sensitive to both vertical and horizontal contrast on F5.6 or large apeture lenses.
For 450D only the centre one of the 9 points is cross type, the other 8 points are not they are just horizontal type.
The 40D AF on low light situation is much much better than 400D, I think the 450D is just similar to 400D on AF. I consider the 40D AF in low light are even better than 5D.
(PS. I have all mentioned bodies except 450D, not yet available)
|
|
|
|
 |
|