近日收到不少網友意見，指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站，此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論，並正密切留意事態的發展。
| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
patpatcanon
註冊: 2008-05-24
上載我的肖像
|
 Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
|
Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好?
|
|
|
|
 |
White owl
註冊: 2007-05-23
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
唔計$$$
一定Canon 17-55mm is USM 好,
...
|
|
|
|
|
patpatcanon
註冊: 2008-05-24
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
|
兩支鏡質素相距有幾遠
|
|
|
|
|
garyz
註冊: 2006-09-17
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
有錢, 梗係買17-55mm 啦.
無乜水咪 A16囉.
一分錢一分貨.
17-55mm 價錢貴 A16 $4000 蚊...
|
|
|
|
|
HASE
註冊: 2003-03-09
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
|
買17-55不如買24-105啦
|
|
|
|
|
mkj_aves
註冊: 2005-01-03
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
17-55 與24-105是不同~ 光圈都唔同啦~
意見~ A16我曾經擁有, 17-55用到唔捨得放手~
Sharp d, 對焦快d, 有防震~
24-105唔夠wide, 長期放係防潮箱~ 等Full Frame機來~
希望幫到樓主~
|
|
|
|
|
White owl
註冊: 2007-05-23
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM,
都唔差喎!!
|
|
|
|
|
gwu1
註冊: 2007-09-26
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 27 日 |
|
|
|
17-55 f2.8 is is better than A16. but how much better? it is very subjective. i think the better quality fully justifies the price difference. but other persons think that the better quality does NOT justify the price difference and that it is only slight better..........
|
|
|
|
|
alex9668
註冊: 2002-11-11
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 29 日 |
|
|
>>i think the better quality fully justifies the price difference. but other persons think that the better quality does NOT justify the price difference and that it is only slight better..........
講得好...呢個就係 性價比 既原意...
|
|
|
|
|
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 29 日 |
|
|
Whenever people ask this type of questions I will post this typical photos,
which among these three lenses, A16, 17-40 and 17-55 f2.8 IS only 17-55 f2.8 IS can take this photos, 400D handheld, iso 1600, no flash is allowed, f2.8, 1/8".
<center>
 <br><br>
</center>
|
|
|
|
|
gwu1
註冊: 2007-09-26
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 30 日 |
|
|
bb1032003,
Welcome back!! I have been wondering when you would be back from your Japan trip. I believe it must have been a nice trip. Japan is a good place for vacation, family and photos as well. If you don't mind and have time, post some photos for sharing. Talk to you later.
|
|
|
|
|
wa_hk
註冊: 2002-08-21
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 30 日 |
|
|
上周買咗A16, 除了對焦稍慢(用在40D還可以, 買時接在部400D就真係慢)及澡音稍大(我可接受)外, 小巧及質素暫時滿意! 肯花錢還是買 17-55好! 起碼對焦快的, 大支的(威水的).
另外, 對於死物來說, 防震絶對有優勢!
未有防震年代, 50mm以下, 1/4"間中用下都ok, 數碼年代, 冇呢支歌仔唱了.
|
|
|
|
|
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 30 日 |
|
|
gwu1,
Thank you for your welcome.
I was back at 22 May but a lot of things outstanding to be resolved, The trip was great and I drove in Japan and their GPS is excellent !! The weather was so and so, sunny, cloudy and rainny within the 9 days. I have taken the Mount Fuji and the start of the Trail event.
Our team has 16 memebers to Japan and 4 memebers formally registered to walk and finaly 6 people completed all the 100km at 44hr12min. I did not walk as I need to drive as the support team.
For those photos, I am still working on them, will post some later.
|
|
|
|
|
HASE
註冊: 2003-03-09
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 31 日 |
|
|
|
講真, 就算17-55比A16好, 但好幾多呢? 有冇C HING 作過比較啦, 要同機同景, 同光圈等條件喎; 但價錢貴成3000千元有多喎, 買多支50/1.4加埋FILTER都仲得.
|
|
|
|
|
HASE
註冊: 2003-03-09
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Tamrom A16 好，定係Canon 17-55mm is USM 好? Post time: 5 月 31 日 |
|
|
|
其實我真系想睇o下差幾遠, 有冇C HING有TEST REPORT丫?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
