9 月 11 日 (星期四) | 會員登記|會員中心
吹水閒聊
近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1共 7 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

mousetc




註冊: 2003-01-05

上載我的肖像
題目點解CasioQV5700.....???     Post time: 3 月 9 日

睇?左好耐二手區,發現非常非常之少人出讓QV5700,唔知是?原因呢!!
Back to top

unlimit




註冊: 2003-02-02

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....???     Post time: 3 月 9 日

I guess it was not too much people own the 1st hand QV5700. Less than 10% G3 or 5050 owners.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

hanrie




註冊: 2003-01-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....???     Post time: 3 月 9 日

愛不釋手~ 哈
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

sugimoto




註冊: 2002-12-02

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....???     Post time: 3 月 9 日

因為qv5700用既都係g2鏡,我諗影出黎既相同g2/g3唔會差好多,我睇過只比較淡小小,而g2/g3d相再自然d,同埋5700仲係500萬像tim,比canon高,其實我都諗緊買g3定係5700,hehe,都唔知點好,有冇人可以比d意見我呀..............
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

mousetc




註冊: 2003-01-05

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....???     Post time: 3 月 9 日

各位suqimoto:
我都好認同你的講法,不過g2,g3同qv5700在功能及像素上亦有不同之處,在價錢上就相距不遠,不知道這是否一個主因呢!!其實兩者之相片在質素及效果上又如何呀??各位兄台可否比D意見呀! 如有qv5700作品可否post出來給欣賞下.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

sugimoto




註冊: 2002-12-02

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....???     Post time: 3 月 9 日

致mousetc兄及各位,
我睇過g3同5700拍出黎既相,都係覺得g3比較自然,冇咁生硬同電腦感,但係就好似偏紅少少(但可以接受),而5700都靚,不過就淡少少同比較有少少電腦感(但都比f300好).
我諗雖然大家都係用g2鏡,不過鏡一樣以外,大家用料始終唔一樣,所以都有一定分別.
都希望各位兄台比一些5700同g3既意見
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

HWC




註冊: 2003-01-30

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....???     Post time: 3 月 9 日

It is difficult to choose from G3 and QV5700.

1) Photo quality -- G3 is colourful and QV5700 is natural.
2) Resulotion -- G3 is 4MP but QV5700 is 5MP
3) Flash light -- G3 is better than QV5700. G3 has hotshoe and support TTL. QV5700 can add external flash light only.
4) Function -- QV5700 has Best Shot profile (good for beginner).
5) Operation -- QV5700 is easy to use. G3 is also easy but difficult than QV5700.
6) Outlook -- QV5700 is black in colour and cool. G3 is stupid.
7) LCD -- G3 can totate the LCD. QV5700 cannot.
8) AF light -- G3 is strong and white color. QV5700 is weak and orange in color. But it is still difficult to focus in dark place for both DC evemn many DC.
9) Focus speed -- G3 is little bit faster than QV5700.
10) Battery -- QV5700 use AA battery. G3 use Canon battery. QV5700 is convenience.
11) Size -- QV5700 is smaller than G3. Easy to carry.
12) Filter -- QV5700 has many filter color such as blue, green, purple...but G3 hasn't this function.
13) Histogram -- QV5700 is easy to use than G3.

But I've already sold out my QV5700 and bought G3. Because I want to try G3. No other reason. After I use G3 for a week, I think that G3 is a little bit better than QV5700 for the photo quality. So I like it. But I'll try to change Sony F717 next week.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

kith613




註冊: 2002-03-22

上載我的肖像
題目Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....???     Post time: 3 月 9 日

Really want to know the noise control ability in both DCs r!!!^o^
Can anyone post some pictures taken by Casio 5700 at ISO 200 or above? thx!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1共 7 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: