近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
mousetc
註冊: 2003-01-05
上載我的肖像
|
點解CasioQV5700.....??? Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
睇?左好耐二手區,發現非常非常之少人出讓QV5700,唔知是?原因呢!!
|
|
|
|
 |
unlimit
註冊: 2003-02-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....??? Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
I guess it was not too much people own the 1st hand QV5700. Less than 10% G3 or 5050 owners.
|
|
|
|
 |
hanrie
註冊: 2003-01-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....??? Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
愛不釋手~ 哈
|
|
|
|
 |
sugimoto
註冊: 2002-12-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....??? Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
因為qv5700用既都係g2鏡,我諗影出黎既相同g2/g3唔會差好多,我睇過只比較淡小小,而g2/g3d相再自然d,同埋5700仲係500萬像tim,比canon高,其實我都諗緊買g3定係5700,hehe,都唔知點好,有冇人可以比d意見我呀..............
|
|
|
|
 |
mousetc
註冊: 2003-01-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....??? Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
各位suqimoto:
我都好認同你的講法,不過g2,g3同qv5700在功能及像素上亦有不同之處,在價錢上就相距不遠,不知道這是否一個主因呢!!其實兩者之相片在質素及效果上又如何呀??各位兄台可否比D意見呀! 如有qv5700作品可否post出來給欣賞下.
|
|
|
|
 |
sugimoto
註冊: 2002-12-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....??? Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
致mousetc兄及各位,
我睇過g3同5700拍出黎既相,都係覺得g3比較自然,冇咁生硬同電腦感,但係就好似偏紅少少(但可以接受),而5700都靚,不過就淡少少同比較有少少電腦感(但都比f300好).
我諗雖然大家都係用g2鏡,不過鏡一樣以外,大家用料始終唔一樣,所以都有一定分別.
都希望各位兄台比一些5700同g3既意見
|
|
|
|
 |
HWC
註冊: 2003-01-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....??? Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
It is difficult to choose from G3 and QV5700.
1) Photo quality -- G3 is colourful and QV5700 is natural.
2) Resulotion -- G3 is 4MP but QV5700 is 5MP
3) Flash light -- G3 is better than QV5700. G3 has hotshoe and support TTL. QV5700 can add external flash light only.
4) Function -- QV5700 has Best Shot profile (good for beginner).
5) Operation -- QV5700 is easy to use. G3 is also easy but difficult than QV5700.
6) Outlook -- QV5700 is black in colour and cool. G3 is stupid.
7) LCD -- G3 can totate the LCD. QV5700 cannot.
8) AF light -- G3 is strong and white color. QV5700 is weak and orange in color. But it is still difficult to focus in dark place for both DC evemn many DC.
9) Focus speed -- G3 is little bit faster than QV5700.
10) Battery -- QV5700 use AA battery. G3 use Canon battery. QV5700 is convenience.
11) Size -- QV5700 is smaller than G3. Easy to carry.
12) Filter -- QV5700 has many filter color such as blue, green, purple...but G3 hasn't this function.
13) Histogram -- QV5700 is easy to use than G3.
But I've already sold out my QV5700 and bought G3. Because I want to try G3. No other reason. After I use G3 for a week, I think that G3 is a little bit better than QV5700 for the photo quality. So I like it. But I'll try to change Sony F717 next week.
|
|
|
|
 |
kith613
註冊: 2002-03-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 點解CasioQV5700.....??? Post time: 3 月 9 日 |
|
|
Really want to know the noise control ability in both DCs r!!!^o^
Can anyone post some pictures taken by Casio 5700 at ISO 200 or above? thx!
|
|
|
|
 |
|