[oly750]

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/090218/4/ar7u.html

[~metal~]

早排 Yahoo 拍賣又係私自改條款
好多人都小小聲

[亞典波羅]

話明係 internet game, 梗係唔認真.

我放在 facebook 的個人資料係流料. 相片一張都冇放.

[oly750]

我唔介意佢改條款，不過做任何事都要光明正大，唔好偷偷摸摸，改咪大大聲聲話俾人知 law, 人地入唔入去有選擇權
改條款之前既account 都要安排掛, 唔通你鬼祟改左就當人接受?

[maximilianyuen]

Update on TermsShare

by Mark Zuckerberg Yesterday at 2:17pm
A couple of weeks ago, we revised our terms of use hoping to clarify some parts for our users. Over the past couple of days, we received a lot of questions and comments about the changes and what they mean for people and their information. Based on this feedback, we have decided to return to our previous terms of use while we resolve the issues that people have raised.

Many of us at Facebook spent most of today discussing how best to move forward. One approach would have been to quickly amend the new terms with new language to clarify our positions further. Another approach was simply to revert to our old terms while we begin working on our next version. As we thought through this, we reached out to respected organizations to get their input.

Going forward, we've decided to take a new approach towards developing our terms. We concluded that returning to our previous terms was the right thing for now. As I said yesterday, we think that a lot of the language in our terms is overly formal and protective so we don't plan to leave it there for long.

More than 175 million people use Facebook. If it were a country, it would be the sixth most populated country in the world. Our terms aren't just a document that protect our rights; it's the governing document for how the service is used by everyone across the world. Given its importance, we need to make sure the terms reflect the principles and values of the people using the service.

Our next version will be a substantial revision from where we are now. It will reflect the principles I described yesterday around how people share and control their information, and it will be written clearly in language everyone can understand. Since this will be the governing document that we'll all live by, Facebook users will have a lot of input in crafting these terms.

You have my commitment that we'll do all of these things, but in order to do them right it will take a little bit of time. We expect to complete this in the next few weeks.

>>>>>>>
In the meantime, we've changed the terms back to what existed before the February 4th change
<<<<<<<<<

, which was what most people asked us for and was the recommendation of the outside experts we consulted.

If you'd like to get involved in crafting our new terms, you can start posting your questions, comments and requests in the group we've created—Facebook Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. I'm looking forward to reading your input.

[maximilianyuen]

double mistakes

[kingkonghk]

冇所謂, 朕用FACEBOOK來娛樂, 所有個淫G了都係創作出來, 朕D FB朋友雞本上係35 SICK 7

[maximilianyuen]

I have 17 friends in FB, and I do know them all in person...but not really in a true meaning of friends....

somebody you will see everyday is kinda hard to reject their invitation....

[kingkonghk]

朕有千9幾個FAN, 得幾個真係SICK

[亞典波羅]

千九幾個咁少, 我識得有位成三千九幾....

果D真日理萬機.

king sir 你懶喇..... ^_^

[kingkonghk]

朕後宮3000, 得千9幾見得下人, 其他太靚, 放上fb驚俾人溝

[casino111]

>>>我放在 facebook 的個人資料係流料. 相片一張都冇放

Ray 兄,你响dc兇啲相和文,如何處理?

[亞典波羅]

>> Ray 兄,你响dc兇啲相和文,如何處理?

呵呵, 個人資料都係流料, 貼左果邊的相都係相簿 link 啊, 我只要 disable 就搞掂 ^^

[亞典波羅]

岩岩收到風, dc 凶果度, 有一個 IP 成十幾廿個戶口狂加個別戶口的分, D戶口咁多, 真係好多個人資料外洩 ^^

晨早都話呢D係 internet game XD

[kingkonghk]

朕DONE記肥花o個d係堅料, 駛乜驚