[berger]

好似多些人講602影人&景好一些，咁唔知717又會唔會太差，因為我想買機，而家心大心細，最主要係717個外型好see d，不過602就好似function好一些，大家有咩意見

[berger]

影景多數係日頭，夜景又好唔好呢?

[tam_dominic]

If image quality is your first concern go with 717.

Since the lauch of camera :
602 dropped about $1,000.-
717 dropped about $2,000.-

If I have $5,000 spare I'll get a 717
They are of different class of product.

[HWC]

No need to think. F717 is much better than S602Z. Even F707 is also better than S602Z. Buy it la, price is very attractive now. But we cannot compare F717 with a lower class model such as S602Z. But price of s602Z is too high now.

[goblin]

Althought I don't like these two labels. (Sony-isolative; Fuji-not too honest). I'll perfer 717.

[stocklaz]

富士佢好誠實, 只係其他人對佢唔理解, 尤其如果你係講佢用sccd (富士一直冇講s602 係六百萬有效象數機, 佢好坦白咁講係用三百萬 )

咁講啦, 如果你想影人

要個人sharp, 用717
要個人soft, 用602

仲有, 一部相機好唔好睇係個人的印象, 我個人就只會鐘意相機是黑色的... (咁先係pro )

602 價唔減得多, 因為太好sale, 根本唔駛減價........ 而717咁好賣係全日本都知道既事實黎, 所以來到香港一定平d (所以係抵, 冇錯 )

仲有一點, 如果你想有其他人幫你, 用你的相機影相, 咁就最好買602, 因為佢易上手好多........... (去旅行去得多的經驗......)

[Briancat]

I compare many web site all over the world and find that the photo quality of s602z is poor than F717. Fact, I don't know why the price of a S602Z is too high. Some Japan water goods man said that S602Z is not so good in Japan as Japanese do not like Super CCD very much. They said that Canon and Sony is good in CCD technology and quality.

[stocklaz]

你係講曬左出黎, 還是在電腦每個pixel 睇??

仲有, 要記住, 如果你要比較, 就要知, 你係用一部三百萬象的相去比五百萬象的相, 所以比較時, 是看300 的在同級中是否好, 而500 的在同級又是否好...

有另一個topic 都在講這兩部機, 有位仁兄講得好, 這兩部機不能比較, 因為唔同級, 用法都唔同.

我的睇法, 要學影相, 用數碼, 要靚, 用film slr

[x8888x]

我用兵F 717