近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
alvincyt
註冊: 2003-01-15
上載我的肖像
|
理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 6 日 |
|
|
即係話, ISO50加兩秒曝光, 同ISO100加一秒曝光, 效果係咪一樣?
|
|
|
|
 |
Terry Hon
註冊: 2002-11-14
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
應該係多一級.
e.g.when u are using iso50, the shutter speed is 1/125 and the aperture is F8.0, then when u are using iso100, if the amount of light is the same, the aperture is F8.0 and the shutter speed is 1/250.(in aperture priority mode)
|
|
|
|
 |
老叟
註冊: 2003-04-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
計正來講,比iso64先至係o岩o岩高一倍!!
|
|
|
|
 |
jackngai
註冊: 2002-08-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
計正來講,比iso64先至係o岩o岩高一倍!!<<<<<<<
唔明..........
ISO1600 --->800--->400--->200--->100
以上全部一級級咁落, 點解 100 之後唔係 50 , 而係 64呢?
|
|
|
|
 |
Kelvin KC Chan
註冊: 2003-05-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
If ISO 50, use f5.6; when ISO 100, you can use f2.8.
The shutter setting is depended on what f you use.
|
|
|
|
 |
Kelvin KC Chan
註冊: 2003-05-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
Sorry, this is correct : if ISO 50, use f2.8; when ISO 100, you can use f5.6.
Sorry again.
|
|
|
|
 |
Velsper
註冊: 2002-04-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
>>if ISO 50, use f2.8; when ISO 100, you can use f5.6.
補充少少~
在相同快門速度下
>>計正來講,比iso64先至係o岩o岩高一倍!!
老叟兄, 你是否指菲林實際感光值不足的問題?
|
|
|
|
 |
ftslee
註冊: 2002-04-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
Kelvin兄,ISO 50 如果同 ISO100 差一級
咁光圈唔係f/2.8減一級即係f/4咩?
即係f/1.4 -> f/2 -> f/2.8 -> f/4 -> f/5.6
每一級數差 sqrt(2)
有冇計錯數?
|
|
|
|
 |
ftslee
註冊: 2002-04-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
係喎,資料來自dpreview.com
http://www.dpreview.com/learn/Glossary/Exposure/Exposure_01.htm
同一快門及ISO之下,每 sqrt(2)的光圈值相差一個EV
|
|
|
|
 |
ftslee
註冊: 2002-04-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
即係話alvincyt 兄所講係冇錯,同一光圈下ISO100同ISO50係要相差一陪曝光時間?
關於ISO…我都唔係好明點解會唔係ISO50而係ISO64呢?
其實照計ISO係一個standard,我都唔明點解係dpreview.com裡面比較Olympus C5050同G3時會有此說:
This test was made far more complicated by the G3's higher than reported sensitivity. In effect the G3 was a full stop more sensitive than the C-5050 Zoom at the same indicated ISO, this meant that the G3 was shooting with a 1/50 sec, F4.0 exposure at it's ISO 50, the same exposure as the C-5050 Zoom at ISO 100. Thus to fairly compare the G3 and C-5050 Zoom we must compare crops from each camera a stop of sensitivity apart.
詳見 http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusc5050z/page15.asp
有冇朋友可以解說一下?
|
|
|
|
 |
Elliott
註冊: 2002-09-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
"As we've noted previously Canon's indicated ISO 50 is fairly conservative, indeed for the G3 I would put that indicated sensitivity closer to ISO 80."
詳見 http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong3/page16.asp
(Oh.... 我仲以為ISO value係個個都一樣tim.... 原來Canon係高少少個喎...)
|
|
|
|
 |
Kelvin KC Chan
註冊: 2003-05-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 7 日 |
|
|
Hello ftslee,
Thanks to post the correct idea:
即係f/1.4 -> f/2 -> f/2.8 -> f/4 -> f/5.6
I check the " Bible" find what I said is wrong. : ( ha...ha... : )
Thanks again : )
|
|
|
|
 |
kevin_chiu
註冊: 2003-06-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 8 日 |
|
|
re elliott
其實直情差一個stop..
|
|
|
|
 |
hkhei
註冊: 2002-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 理論上ISO100既感光度係咪比ISO50高一倍? Post time: 6 月 8 日 |
|
|
一個stop即係一倍
|
|
|
|
 |
|