[fannycht]

Has any c hing ever tried the two lens above? Really justified for that big price gap? $6,XXX vs $14,XXX!

I am thinking of buying a tele-zoom and still struggling in between.

[onlyken]

I have 80-200mm f2.8, it is really a very good and sharp lens. But it doesn't has VR and AFS. So, if you have money, 70-200 VR la. If you have no too much money as me, buy 80-200 f2.8.

[B and H]

我未用過80-200mm, 只睇過好多review同其他影友意見, 單論c/p值而您唔一定須要afs and vr, 應該係80-200mm高, 兩者成像差佢好似唔係好大, 但70-200多左10mm, afs 同vr, 值唔值, 見人見智, 但最終我都入左70-200mm個支 ^_^

[fwan67]

I've used both, the result image almost similar. At least I can't identify which is better :(

The only good things is VR features. On focusing speed, both are similar when attached to D80. Only VR will let you able to take photo in quite dark place.