[cat_yu]

心水有兩支:-
A) Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro $2XXX
B) Nikon AF-S VR Macro 105mm F/2.8 $4XXX

請問各位師兄師姐:
1) 邊支好D呢? 如果Nikon好D,但係貴成仟幾蚊值唔值呀?
2) VR係呢個焦段影微距緊要嗎?
3) Tamron果支聽講影人像都唔錯,係唔係呢? Nikon個支影人像其實又得唔得架?
4) 有沒有其他好介紹?唔好太重啊!

感激各位 ^_^

[ringomov]

兩支鏡質素都相‧當高但Nikon支有VR同超聲波馬達正好多，近攝係較暗環境下VR有幫助，雖然係貴d 但真一支好鏡買左唔會後侮。

[cat_yu]

Thanks ringomov ^^ 我都認為Nikon個支正.
不過剛剛去完X成問價,Nikon 個支$5,500, Tamron個支$2,600咋,
成double有多呀! 大家點睇?

[onlyken]

Nikon 105 VR is a MUST !

[cat_yu]

我用D80. 見Forum有人講 Nikon 105 VR 配 D80 有遊焦情況,要用MF解決,
請問如果係的話會唔會構成對焦慢同唔方使呢?(尤其我係新手!)

[ringomov]

講成像質素兩支唔差太遠，龍仔果支對焦時摩打吱吱聲要接受，Nikon 果支VR係貴但對焦較快靜，不過若果真係经濟問題，龍仔都萛好低玩架，凡事唔好免強，支鏡有幾靚都要鏡主懂得用佢。

我自都支Sigma 150mm Marco 都唔係原廠質素都很好。

[ringomov]

你講遊焦問題真係末聽過，支鏡咁貴有事Nikon 一定比人投訴，見好多師兄都用得很好.

[cat_yu]

Thank you ^^

[holyAS]

nikon 支105遊焦真係聽都未聽過…

[cat_yu]

好似話配D80先至有遊焦wor!

[Obi-Wan]

I don't have 105VR, so don't know its focusing speed, BUT my Tamron 90/2.8 focus very very slow on Canon 20D, so can't auto focus flying insects. I think it would not be faster on Nikon too.

The quality of the lens is very very good, sharp to the edge, the bokeh is also nice (but not the best).

So it is a good lens for stationary object, but a poor lens for fast moving object.

If I have $4xxx, I must buy 105VR

[pkpartner]

銀根短又想玩原廠鏡 可以諗下舊版 AF105 無AFS無VR
手動/AF有小小唔方便 摩打幾大聲 但係速度快 成像銳利 二手價同龍仔果支相約

[Dankyu]

兩枝都有, Tamron是舊版, (新版偏黃, 但舊版好難找) 對焦也不慢, 但好嘈, 當然要拍飛行中的蝴蝶或蜂的機會率一定唔夠Nikon枝105VR高, 拍人像也很好,兩枝都未聽過有走焦情況.

[phtlam]

Ching, 我就用緊D300同龍仔90mm, 都好正呀. 不如放比你, 試完唔OK你又可以再放. 我就去買枝105VR玩吓. 同意就PM我啦.

[cat_yu]

I'll go for 105VR ^^