[J2007]

Ching, which one is better ?

[linock]

14-24 is much better~

[snoopybee]

時運高睇唔到

[kin_ww]

14-24 較新~而加仲上埋太空

[salonsip2005]

最主要睇下你影咩呀~!! 用係FF 度17-35 都已經好WIDE~
因為我我成日用支17-35 影人像多過風景好多~ 所以我覺得夠用LA 呢支已經~
太WIDE 唔0岩我~

[GUNDAM2010]

價錢差不多梗係14-24

[hanny]

14~24 CAN NOT USE UV PROTECT LENS

I LOVE 17~35 MORE

14-24 TOO WIDE

[icelemon]

I also think 17-35 on D700 will be very good?

anyone has this on D700?

[Danny Wong]

14-24 is good in FX.

[pkpartner]

兩碌都好
14-24 用唔到filter (cpl, uv, etc....)
17-35 用到standard 77mm filter 但係無14mm嗰個闊度 (FF2.8-4有少少黑角但亦可能係底片關係)
有人話17-35 無14-24個成像咁靚 可能我未夠班 blind test我睇唔出邊支打邊支 只係睇到個14mm同17mm係兩個世界

[SCforever]

14-24 必選

[icelemon]

i plan to travel,
but 14-24 too big to carry around in Long haul trip.....

also plan to buy sigma 2470 hsm

[ssannwong]

14-24 變形控制好, 但自己鍾意17-35多d, 14-24太粗了又比較重, 影風景用不到CPL還是覺得不大好

[J2007]

To all Ching,

Thank you! I think that I would buy 17-35 coz 14-24 用唔到filter & 14-24 is too heavy and big. fyi, I'm using D700.

[terencehonin]

14-24


17-35