[Howardlam]

請問各位師兄,

1) D300/ D90 片幅x1.5 同 全片幅 Nikon D700 影像質素相差有多大?
2) 是否值得用高價換取全片幅影像?

感謝回覆!
小師弟敬上

[enos]

你覺得值，佢就值！

[alexlam49]

>>>你覺得值，佢就值！
答得好! 絕對有答左野!

Q:呀媽係唔係女人呀?
A:係!

[ringomov]

其實值得与否只係視乎你需要而定，比多一萬由D300上D700，係米D相即時靚左，但又唔覺有大分別喎。只不過捉到一羣高消費者心理去完佢地的心頭好。

全片幅合理價應該跌到一萬多D就岩了haha......

[goolman]

過多十年八年全片幅可能三幾千都買到

[andrewlaw007]

Noise control is MUCH better, can use higher ISO, such as ISO3200.
Picture quality is only slightly better and depends on lens. (Canon 30D Vs Nikon D700)

[Howardlam]

If I does not care the quality at high ISO condition. Because I alway take the photo at day time. Is D90 suit for us if view on the performance and economics?

[ringomov]

D90 既拍攝功能其實同D80差不多，對焦系统一樣只不過係多左D除塵同３寸靚mon加拍片功能，若果真係為影相，有要求而買機，D90較為花巧多D，d300會實用同全面似一部專業機.

當然经濟能力上擔得起先上D300.

[andrewlaw007]

Howard,

D90 vs D300
1) Picture quality = similar
2) autofocus speed = D300 win, which good for moving object

[Howardlam]

Thank you for your reply Andrew!!

我想我己找到答案!

請在此Website留意 D700 and D300 比較的相片
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2008/07/30/8930.html

在22%大時, D700 and D300分別不大
但在100%大時, D300 相片中 detail位 e.g.大廈窗戶 相對比較蒙及散。
而D700 相對比較清晰。

但我平常多數在22”Mon 或 沖3R or 4R 觀看相片。
價錢方面D300 or D90 相對比 D700 相宜。
對我來說, 我曾選D90

請各師兄指教, 指教