[ckyee2004]

我想配以上其中一支鏡頭以代替原有之kit鏡, (28xx, 34xx, 47xx)
請師兄提供你們寶貴的意見

[dd wong]

A16

[boxbox]

carl zeiss

[ckyee2004]

我有friend話 Sigma成象唔錯,且有Marco, 唔知Si-Hing點睇?

[Ernest Tang]

講實用性副廠鏡可能會佔優一啲，因為佢專攻原廠鏡係功能上既不足，價錢又抵玩。
講影像質素，現時副廠鏡都可以接受，但講到支援性就有保留嘞，好多時都聽到啲師兄話有走焦既問題。

[fox1114]

我用緊A１６,正

[木木28]

一定係蔡記最好，話比你聽用什廠的因為佢地覺得貴

[oly750]

1680 都唔係FF, 第日賣返出去有無人要?

[木木28]

呢位師 兄好似吾係好知鏡頭焦矩的數字來由，
所有出廠數值都係以135來作標準，所謂FF就等於135的規格。
點會吾係FF？
至於呢Ｄ新出比數碼機用的鏡頭可能有小小差異，
因為CCD同膠片點都會有分別 ，可能不用咁利

[fox1114]

一定係蔡記最好，話比你聽用什廠的因為佢地覺得貴

１６mm出黑角,又變光圈！！成像比龍仔,適馬好少少,唔值咁貴！！！
只係個range好用d,有５０至８０mm用
買蔡司,我會等埋１６-３５ F２。８出先決定囉！！

[herbertau]

base on sony style info,it's not support full frame,it's only support aps-c mode.

[bebetochong]

a16性價比最好

[fallbackskiing]

Provide a link if this can help.

http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/313-sigma-af-17-70mm-f28-45-dc-nikon-review--lab-test-report

This site also have report on Zeiss. Surely Zeiss is better but cost is higher too.

I am also have the same problem on which lens is better for upgrade. Please let me know your final decision.

For FF, now only use in profession model and I think we had no need to spend money on FF unless you already have target to upgrade to FF.

[fallbackskiing]

I had a special ideal!

Usually people use F5.6 or higher for daylight shot. ( For night time shot, I think it is difficult to aware the 黑角 since most of the picture is 黑.)

出黑角 can be a special effects only in case you need that!

So we better buy a lens with 黑角 only in large aperture...... :) ka ka ka....

Sorry 師兄們, if you are not agree, just treat this as a joke.

[fallbackskiing]

師兄們, 支sigma 24-70 F2.8 好似唔錯...

link 有推薦!

http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/318-sigma-af-24-70mm-f28-ex-dg-macro-canon-lab-test-report--review

請問點睇?