[LoinSky]

patnychk : Oh! Really...! Thanks! I thinks need to more consider and research the photos on internet...! Did you have any photos (token by 800mm/f:8.0) share to me for reference...?

patnychk : Totally Agreed!

[APO-L77]

x2!!

[LowTEC]

而家 d 鏡係唔夠光多過唔夠長，打雀一定要快一定要 sharp, 日光日白收到 f 8先sharp去唔到千分之一秒，如果支100-300嘅 f5.6 300mm 時全sharp就已經無敵

[jimmy69608]

我都經常用大姑媽500mm、f4.5手動鏡去打雀

[Ch@nSiR]

http://www.dcfever.com/lens/specification.php?id=166

[LoinSky]

Yes! That's my wanted already! even though seems expensive and slowly AF!
And, Olympus ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 50-200mm F2.8-3.5 SWD also good but cheaper than it!

[LoinSky]

I have bought the Olympus ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 50-200mm F2.8-3.5 SWD few weeks ago, and the lenses is really good, but the Focal Length (400mm) and AF Speed in OMD are really not enough for Ecological Photographic....!
Anyone can be advice which lenses for OMD is the best for Ecological Photographic...?

[Ryeung02]

LoinSky Ching: Can you post some pictures with ED50-200mm len? How is the picture quality ? I have great interest with this len too.

[LoinSky]

http://www.dcfever.com/forum/read.php?f=16&i=4979&t=4979&phorum_auth=bf576f1b1cb91301daa65953dbb31720&page=11

[Ch@nSiR]

For M4/3 body size same as OM-D / EP which is relatively smaller, 50-200 have great C/P value and reasonable size. Some Ching said that the IQ of 50200 beat Canon Small Small White but not good as Canon Small White a bit. Since now using 4/3 lens with a MMF-1/2/3 adapter still cannot maximumize the focusing speed ( about 2 to 3 times slower then using on a 4/3 body, however some 4/3 lens support the focus method of M4/3 which can use almost full speed to focus ). You can wait for the new adapter which olympus may release this years.

I took a picture of a bird before and i think it can show the performance of 50-200. You can check in the following link. I m using the old version of this lens which only have no SWD motor and the number of aperture leaf is less then the new SWD version.

For M4/3 body size same as GH3, which is similar to the size of a entry level DSLR, size of SHG lens is reasonable, performance is perfect, but the prices of the Big 3 SHG lens is almost same as the Big 3 L Series of Canon.

[Ch@nSiR]

The link of my photo:
http://www.omuser.com/thread-143985-1-1.html

Furthermore, Some Ching use the SHG lens on OM-D with grip. The size is reasonable too. Check it :

[img]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/img/dcw/docs/510/854/015.jpg[/img]

[atoyo331]

500MM 2.8 配OMD會唔會好容易失平衡@@

[LowTEC]

唔會, because at weight ratio of 9:1, there is no balance to speak of :P