[水貨佬]

http://www.canon.co.jp/Imaging/eos1dm2/index.html

1. 微粒好粗.
2. d相好灰
3. CMOS 的缺點出曬

好慘呀.....

[adktk]

我覺得 D 相 一 D 問題都無。 好慘o果個似乎係你本人。去驗下眼啦。

Canon Mark II ，出機之日就係我重拾相機之時。

[Martin@SEPHIROT]

The image quality is good, yet not not as good as I expected.

The light and dark areas are under good control, less noise in shadows. Nice color defination.

However the image is not sharp enough when compared to CCD image. Dwonload those image and zoom to 100% in photoshop then you will realize. For portrait, the skintone is not enough.

The construction and response of the camera should be good enough.

[lungdungyee]

SAMPLE 6 的黑色好明顯有noise ..

[jacky2002]

D相好真係好灰.......
明顯係灰好左好多!!

[kennethwhtsui]

D相好正常喎，
你話多noise會唔會係你個芒污糟呀?
有2張相比較灰，
不過我想這是固意的，
雪地太白，影暗D先睇到細節。
另，
相片色調同CMOS/CCD關係唔係太大，
出黎D色係點由影像處理器決定，
無論你用乜模式影相，
影像處理器都會介入調整顏色，
可能CANON個預設唔係好?你taste掛。

[yck18]

哇...........咁正,灰???睇下灰個幾張,光圈係8.0,雪地會反光,要用細光圈先影得好,SAMPLE 3個張好正,而且層次分明

黑色個張有noise?? iso 100 ,快門1/60,f4.0喎......咁setting,noise控制好好啦

[雞蛋仔]

叫一個唔識影相既人去用 1d mk ii 影~影出黎既野咪又係咁.....

所以唔好賴部機~........部機廢極都要38000

[雞蛋仔]

但我見到d example 非常唔錯wor有d.,......d色好好~

[PSP2004]

Don't argue any more!

Some people said DSC-F828 was a rubblish DC.

However, I don't think so. That PK guy should check their eye first before talking 1D mark II.

[stupid_idiot]

相好正啊，我用我部 Mac 睇無問題呀！！
係咪你部機的 Display card 或 Monitor 有問題？？？
定係其他原因。

用多部電腦再睇多一次啦！！！

[tigerz]

越看越喜歡...Canon...中毒了...

[200448]

我估是大家的Monitor 不同, 所以會起疑吧!

我做開的design 試過用不同Monitor去睇，
個灰黑白位全部走晒! 特別是LCD同CRT，
因為「亮度」差距好大的。

這些相都不錯，你試下用來調較一下Mon吧！
除了「亮度」，「對比度」都會影響到畫面的，主要是灰位。

[ibat]

my lcd mon is so bad

......