[gwong88]

Canon 16-35mm F/2.8 L USM 這支鏡行貨要一萬元有多，而水貨要8,000以上，各位高手請問是否值得。買水貨信得過嗎？

[gwong88]

冇人有反應，是否這是貴價物品，所以冇人試過或擁有這支鏡？

[Minkun]

I'm 17-40 user. Smaller aperture but :

1) half price to 16-35
2) 1/5 lighter
3) glass coating for dslr
4) a little bit shorter
5) 聽聞抗耀光及控制變形較佳

除非經常室內暗光拍攝,否則17-40不錯。本人拍風景為主。

[1ds mark ll]

我覺得16-35L一定要買的,除非唔冇錢買,要買就買行貨,水貨一來冇保用二來係唔係全新你點知,是但壞一樣野絛數都計番係到,仲有行貨番廠維修有85折水貨一定冇仲有可能唔同你維修,你話係唔係.

[VDuck]

This lens is a must get if you're into serious wide angle shooting.

Water or not is I think a personal matter. If you have tested and checked and buy from a reliable source, that should not be a problem. Obviously if you get one with warrenty is even better if you don't mind paying the difference.

[gwong88]

多謝各位意見。今天到Ｘ成問過，價錢＄10,380，行貨。見另一支　17-45mm f4 L 約$5400，這支鏡又如何？

[VDuck]

17-45 ??
you mean 17-40?

That is a very nice lens, optics wise probably even better than 16-35 if light is not a problem. but if in low light....