[k27]

小弟用緊30d,得支kit鏡..
想買支長砲好耐架喇,無奈買完30d就冇晒錢 -_-
大家話買邊隻好??
買返canan支70-200有is就真係好吸引
家下個價大約幾多??
我只能預$2000-3000咋 >_<
sigma又點睇??
各位比d意見丫 ^_^

[Real Nobody]

八千幾呀！哥仔！不如你等Canon支新鏡：EF-S 55-200mm IS 好過啦，聽講唔貴，應該唔駛四千咁話喎．．．

[kccw]

Canon EF 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 IS USM

我剛剛買了一個月、$4150百記(最平)、
http://www.ygdragon.net/index.php?page=photo/cameraprice.htm

廠鏡點都對焦快D有保証……特別係長焦距！呢支鏡可以影得好遠好正、買前曾經想過Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS 那支的、但結果放棄了買了呢支！希望幫到你啦！

http://www.dcfever.com/lens/lens.php?lensid=55

[yung2]

sigma 70-300啦，千拎蚊搞掂∼

[Hubs]

Canon EF 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 IS USM

I had the 70-300 IS and 70-200 IS F4. In terms of image quality, there's not much difference between the two. In terms of value for money, I prefer the 70-300 and I regret to have sold it.

I think image stabiliser is very useful for long zoom lenses.

[Real Nobody]

It is true that the Image Stabiliser is very useful for the tele-photo lenses.

就嚟有支新平價EF-S長鏡出啦，等多陣啦！仲配備咗第四代IS添！

[ntwilliam]

I had the Sigma 70-300mm APO DG and was very happy with it except for my handshake. I have sold it and bought the Canon 70-300mm IS USM and am even happier. It is a great lens if you have the budget. If not, go for the Sigma.

[skcorpio]

70-200 f4L is much sharper than 70-300 at wide open aperture... @300mm it's just soft...