上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
fish313313
註冊: 2005-06-14
上載我的肖像
|
近攝鏡 Post time: 1 月 14 日 |
|
|
請教!近攝濾鏡最主要功效可在?用後對拍攝質數會否影響很大?謝謝
|
|
|
|
 |
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 近攝鏡 Post time: 1 月 15 日 |
|
|
作用同放大鏡差唔多.可以將細小物體影得比較大.
|
|
|
|
 |
fish313313
註冊: 2005-06-14
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 近攝鏡 Post time: 1 月 15 日 |
|
|
thinks!現在比較明白.
|
|
|
|
 |
seesee
註冊: 2003-08-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 近攝鏡 Post time: 1 月 17 日 |
|
|
Dear,
Would you please tell us what are the advantages and disadvantages of the 近攝鏡 ?
Can we using on any camera ?
Would you suggest the brand name or model of the lens (+1, +2 or +3) to us ?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
peterchan04
註冊: 2004-11-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 近攝鏡 Post time: 1 月 20 日 |
|
|
我用 bronica etrsi 就加過 [近攝濾鏡]
(seesee--- 係 filter not a lens, 跟 lens 口徑大細買)
跟平時影一樣. 係 focus 埋佐... 出來微距效果幾好.
|
|
|
|
 |
seesee
註冊: 2003-08-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 近攝鏡 Post time: 1 月 23 日 |
|
|
Thanks, peterchan04,
I have some questions on marco filter (近攝濾鏡 : +1, +2 and +3..) and the extension tube. Both can carry magnification on the subject. I known that the price of the filter is lower than the tube, and the extension tube is mounted between the camera body and the len. But I wish to know : -
Which one is better to take photo ?
Are there any limitation on it ? Distance ? Sharp quality ?
How about the minimum requirement of len when using the extension tuble ? F5.6 or F8 ?
謝謝 ! Thank You !
|
|
|
|
 |
seesee
註冊: 2003-08-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 近攝鏡 Post time: 1 月 24 日 |
|
|
Sorry for some incorrect description :-
marco filter (近攝濾鏡 : +1, +2 and +3..) means the close-up filters (+1., +2, +3..)
Take a photo in short distance and magnify the object.
Have you any commend on they ?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
|