[Vincent Lam]

我見人 post 一些感覺好正的相, 話用了 E 沖 C.

其實係點做架??? 我部G3做到嗎???

thanks regards

[oldpear]

不用理會那些賣弄技巧之徒, 所謂E沖C, 係玩菲林機的一種無聊手法, 傳統負片(底片)用C41沖藥, SLIDE(幻燈)用E-6沖藥, 用錯膠片顏色就錯到離譜, 形成一種獨有色調。

DC可以營造同樣氣氛, 但未必同"E沖C"或"C沖E"的效果完全一樣, 又或者用軟件後期製作都可以。你試下在不同光源下對住不是白色的物體作白平衡調準, 將反差調到最強, 效果非常戲劇化, 你做過多種嘗試之後, 可能找出一個方案模仿"E沖C"也說不定。

[philipng100]

Details pls see: (I'm not sure if you need to register first)

http://pcphoto.popart.com.hk/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=56


Learn one more thing, no harm.

[cfkw]

thanks that, dear philipng100.
That s the attitude...

[cafe1hk]

"E to C" or "C to E" process is commonly known as cross processing.. it is not "無聊" but rather a method to express your photo or a feeling you have about a image. Usually image obtained from cross processing is very intense as some colour will appear more bold.

for a more detail decusssion about cross process I have found a good artical in agfa.com the link is "http://www.agfanet.com/en/cafe/photocourse/classiccourse/200005/cont_index.php3"

[oldpear]

我在這裡所講的"無聊", 是站在dc用家的立場講, 老實說我自己都曾經醉心於"e沖c"和"c沖e", 在數碼相機未流行前, 這玩意確實係一種嘩眾取寵的手法, 但是有幾多人捨得犧牲整筒菲林? 沖費又貴過人, 換來錯到離譜的顏色而事前無法預料, 反差硬到完全無晒層次, 微粒又粗如iso10000.....

用軟件或者刻意錯認白平衡, dc玩出來的效果更加多變, 而且幾乎不費一分一毫。

[cafe1hk]

you can say the process is a expensive method.. but it is definately not
"嘩眾取寵" ... an good image needs to be planned carefully.. as an photographer one certain should try different method available... the whole point of cross proess is to create a bold look... and the "bad" points you are talking about can be good points too, everything is two sided.

anyway this should be last post from me this matter, before it starts to looks like a bloody fight.