[deutsch]

小弟功力尚淺﹐純粹用部DC仔憑感覺去構圖再因應環境去設定測光/光圈快門/白平衡等﹐出黎既作品係咪都要執先靚呢﹖
因小弟認為執相會令相片太過人工化﹐有點假...
請高人指點﹗

[Philippe]

都唔一定的,但係做小小優化都冇乜問題,只要唔好剪剪就得

[philip5cf]

let me ask you is it against the law if you ran through a yellow light? not so since the law tell you when you see a yellow light and you are too closed to the cross, you should go through with care and under normal speed! its not mean if you redone your photo then you will have it unnatural! it depend on how do you do it and how heavy you doing it. decorated is not BUILD! lets say we RECOVERED THE PHOTO and not
PRODUCE one!

[呀超]

其實唔多唔少都要執o的，好似調整一o下反差及光暗係須要的，增加一o的清晰度亦無可厚非。

如果搞到張相.............就無謂喇！睇得出咖。

[kunyu]

如果係自己在電腦整,就多數都會執執o架啦!就算係玩菲林都係咁o架啦!曬相時都會在光位加d,暗位減d咁...執相係令張相更靚咁解o既o者!不過一般人可能將執相同改相混淆左...

[FriendFriends]

我就覺得要從攝影中學到野或者提高自己的攝影水平的話就最好唔好執相同改相啦.因為如果次次影得唔好就走去執下改下,那簡直對不起自己,更對不起攝影,因為攝影就是要把世上最真,最美的一刻永遠留下.如果下下都靠執相同改相,那麼不用買相機啦.乾脆買部電腦裝個photoshop就得啦!
如果d相影得唔好,就要從中學習什麼地方出錯,以作改善!這樣拍攝技術和經驗才會提升的.簡單d講,一次旅行拍攝都有成幾十,幾百張相,下下一張張靠改靠執,你自問可以改得多少張?而且這些菲林照片,由其是正片,都是只有一take的.所以想照片影得好,就一定要多拍多實踐.日子久了不用改相執相,自然也能拍出好照片!

[oozz]

I see nothing wrong to re-do photos on the computer while the finished thing should not be called a photo but an art piece in mixed-media, maybe.
Just like the modern art pieces merging even sculpture in a painting.

The value of photographed images is being unique on the timeline that should not be re-done. I don't like composite images. Tunning and enhacement on computer is not that bad a thing.

[stg新手]

我都覺得有少少執執係好d

如果話要將最真一刻留低就只係用人腦個記憶咋

用相機點都唔會係最真

[tam_dominic]

My Question to you :
What is the difference between :
1. set contrast, saturation, sharpness in camera
2. set the same thru computer software

What I want :
Impressive imaged recorded from real life.

How I get that image :
1. Shot the scene or any object that I interest using a camera
Filters, flash ligh, tripod and even an umbrella are tools to help me shooting.
2. Use whatever technique I know to improve the image to my satifaction
I need tools to achieve this too.
e.g. high low contrast photo paper
Photo paper of different effects.
Photoshop alike software.
Both 1 and 2 are just tools to achieve what I want.
Definitely Camera is the pre-requisite without it the product is just an image and not a photo.

My answer to you :
I doubted you can set contrast, saturation, sharpness to low and can produce a decent photo right out of any Digital Camera
.
All professionals post process their image from their digital camera WITHOUT EXCEPTION.

Thus there is no room to argue.
Good photos must gone thru post processing.

;^) He He :-)

[Piclike]

都很同意以上的說法,過往在FILM的年代我們會選不同牌子的FILM來配合如不同牌子鏡頭的個別色彩的表現以達到所估計的照片色彩.在拍攝前都會看當時
的天色用上不同的濾鏡如82A及80C…等等.
今天的DC世界,以上的技巧以交給手上的相機,我估其實不同牌子及級數的相機都有着它們不同的處理色彩,反差及曝光的取向,即使你在手動作調校都是有着其機的本色.當然及相信越貴價的機個softwear越好la,但是最重要都是機主本人去了解自己部機的優點及劣處,用最其可調校的寬容度,就好比我們用不同FILM去攝取不同的影像所須一樣的方法.
有一些經驗還想分享吓,如果我們發現拍攝這刻的陽光太強,暗位部份與光位相差超過兩級光圈或以上,(當然最好是補光及是用PL)但如果你的是較平價沒有強外閃可用又不能夠加filter在鏡頭前的DC仔,見議把反差由原來高或中性的向下調低一至二度,微減曝光,即使事後須要用softwear更改,把反差及明亮度再向上推高都沒什麽困難和復習,因為在拍攝時你已把光位的部份儲存了最多的details.這樣便不會太死白了.

這是本人的小小意見,如錯漏即請更正.