上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
vng_01
註冊: 2010-10-19
上載我的肖像
|
Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 14 日 |
|
|
I am going to buy either lens. 影 "人像" and" 風景" 各佔 50%. Which lens is good for this situation?
Many thanks!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
nwt15
註冊: 2005-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 14 日 |
|
|
17-40 becomes a standard lens in APS-C, you may find it is not wide enough, but may be good for portait...
|
|
|
|
 |
vng_01
註冊: 2010-10-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 14 日 |
|
|
Hi nwt15,
That's what I though too. However, I don't have friends who own these 2 camera lens. That's why I need to seek advice from this forum. Do you use both?
|
|
|
|
 |
biggods
註冊: 2007-06-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 14 日 |
|
|
其實兩支都有問題, 10-22影風景VERY GOOD, 但影人像怪及變形, 17-40影風景不夠WIDE,但影人像又不滿不足
|
|
|
|
 |
vng_01
註冊: 2010-10-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 14 日 |
|
|
Hi biggods,
I know the fact about 10-22mm. Do you own 17-40mm? Could you share how its 不足的地方?
|
|
|
|
 |
nwt15
註冊: 2005-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 14 日 |
|
|
I have 17-40, but I am using 5D2, I like it so much (landscape only)..^___^
|
|
|
|
 |
vng_01
註冊: 2010-10-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 14 日 |
|
|
For 5D2, it is really wide..... just same effect as if I picked 10-22 for my 60D.
Do you have camera lens which min is 24 or 28mm?
|
|
|
|
 |
nwt15
註冊: 2005-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 14 日 |
|
|
have one (SIGMA 24-70) before, but seldom use... sold it...
|
|
|
|
 |
biggods
註冊: 2007-06-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 15 日 |
|
|
I am using 550D, so I think is similiar to yr 60D, I have 17-40.
但好少用, 因為當初買只是因為17-40是最平的L鏡, 我本是想用17-40L當標準鏡使用, 但用在550D上, 可能17-40沒有IS及只有F4.0, 所以到晚上或室內拍攝時, 成功率比較低.
以及, 我主要是拍我女, ZOOM到40MM真的到夠近, 我要跟她跑來跑去, 現在轉用了EFS17-55 F2.8 近半年, 番看相片, 17-55的相片的確比17-40的好很多.
我現在用550D/Tokina 11-16 f2.8/EFS 17-55 F2.8/Sigma 70-200 F2.8/580EXII
|
|
|
|
 |
vng_01
註冊: 2010-10-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 15 日 |
|
|
Hi nwt15,
When you sold your 24-70, what camera lens covers your mid range now?
|
|
|
|
 |
biggods
註冊: 2007-06-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 15 日 |
|
|
其實, 我都有一支SIGMA 24-70 F2.8, 我用他主要是他比24-70L平很多, 及CANON用家一般都會覺得CANON拍出來的照片比較淡, 但SIGMA鏡配CANON拍出來的照片比較鮮(帶有味精), 及SIGMA 24-70可給我有菲林味的感覺
|
|
|
|
 |
vng_01
註冊: 2010-10-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 15 日 |
|
|
Hi biggods,
I understand your situation so you always carry your 550D with 17-55 around.
I have sigma 50 f/1.4 and 70-200 f/4 L. Since 50mm is very bad, not quality, just cannot capture more than 3 ppl with a reasonable distance (object and camera). That's why I want to buy a camera lens for capturing more ppl in a pic.
|
|
|
|
 |
nwt15
註冊: 2005-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 15 日 |
|
|
vng_01 ching, I just use the 50/1.8 tocover the mid range, you have my album and you can see there is no mid range photos... or I just get closer to the object with my 17-40
|
|
|
|
 |
look_yau
註冊: 2002-09-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 15 日 |
|
|
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnnyleung/tags/canonef1740mmf4lusm/
17-40 都係風景多
|
|
|
|
 |
biggods
註冊: 2007-06-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Canon EF 17 - 40mm f/4 L or Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm f/3.4-4.5 Post time: 12 月 15 日 |
|
|
其實, 我平日喜歡用SIGMA 24-70配550D,
550D配EFS17-55, 的確拍出來的照片SHARP,GOOD, 但拍的久, 我開始覺得過SHARP, 太重數碼味.
550D配SIGMA 24-70,雖然拍出來的照片沒有17-55的SHARP, 但24-70的焦距的確很好, 可以說是KING OF SNAPSHOT,
|
|
|
|
 |
|