[simon_mme]

聽過好多ching講，由ASPC上 5D2 係完全另一個世界，有D ching直頭話：『ASPC就等於矇住半隻眼哩影野，點會清，等於盲佬影相咁』。其實有無咁誇張？有無神化左部 5D2？其實由ASPC上 5D2 最大分別 / 最大震撼係乜？有無 ching可以講解下。

[Obi-Wan]

I am using 20D, two 50D, 7D and 5D2 with many lenses
I very seldom to use 5D2 because of it slow AF & poor AF performance in the dark.

the biggest difference of 5D2 over other APS-C is
1. lower noise
2. narrower depth of field with the same view angle, e.g. 18mm/5.6 on APS-C has more depth of field than 29mm/5.6 on FF, so FF is better to isolate your object from the background

* I use many bodies, as I seldom change lens

[mnopqcks]

5D2當然有分別啦…但係話係咪完全兩個世界又吳係既...不過都有半個…咩蒙住半邊眼…係誇張左姐…至於有咩分別…手感…操控方式…配合能力…色彩…FF…iso…速度…銳利…同佢既IQ(姐係白平衡數)計得準…都吳同

[隨意隨心]

CMOS感光片幅大左像數高左,
成像自然細緻好左,
呢o的係DX機暫時未到的境界.

[hksawing]

要看看你咩機轉5D2

[ivanivan2]

我由450d上5d2, 感覺系
- 高iso低雜訊
- apsc同ff同一構圖下影像更細緻, 境深更淺
(但有時影野想前後都清被迫要收光圈或者拉wide d行後幾步番黎crop相)
- 5d2對焦系統同450d無乜分別
- awb唔覺話特別準 (不過影raw無所謂, 同埋我個人都喜歡留現場氣氛)

而「ASPC就等於矇住半隻眼哩影野，點會清，等於盲佬影相咁」呢句太誇張... 我以前用450d日光日白iso100 或者200, d相一樣好靚... 我主要係接受唔到apsc高iso既雜訊先至上ff...

[ivanclw]

除左晝質細緻之外, 最重要係唔駛x 1.6 (夠wide), 24-70mm or 24-105 用係5d2真係天涯鏡
ASPC 用17-55mm 唔夠wide,如果影遠野係好, 200mm 變 320mm 不過一年有用到幾多次呢?

[Obi-Wan]

IQ = (姐係白平衡數) <===== 勁!