上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
ykc123
註冊: 2013-03-21
上載我的肖像
|
70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 5 月 31 日 |
|
|
Canon or Tamron or Sigma?
|
|
|
|
 |
hizaku
註冊: 2004-11-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 5 月 31 日 |
|
|
Sigma 唔好諗,
C 70-300 DO 或 non-L 唔好諗
好有錢, C 70-300L,
平靚正, T70-300 VC
|
|
|
|
 |
mluk06
註冊: 2010-02-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 5 月 31 日 |
|
|
完全同意,除左Sigma, 我三支都用過, 常用200-300焦段,有水,有要求, 有紅圈情意結, Canon 70-300L, 不常用, 但又想映下演唱會,小朋友頒奖礼, budget 有限,Tamron 70-300,VC, 包有驚喜,三分一價錢,三份二中白質數,又輕D.
|
|
|
|
 |
ykc123
註冊: 2013-03-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 5 月 31 日 |
|
|
thx for your opinions, but it is said that the "Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM" is hidden L. will it be better than Tamron 70-300 VC?
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 5 月 31 日 |
|
|
70-300 用過以下幾支: L,non-L, T-vc, S APO
質數 L>> T > non-L ~ S APO
如以 70-200段比較,T已經好近L。現在我只keep
L,300段好sharp
結論: 有$買L,冇乜$就買T,不想用300就買小小白non-IS
|
|
|
|
 |
mluk06
註冊: 2010-02-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 6 月 1 日 |
|
|
thx for your opinions, but it is said that the "Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM" is hidden L. will it be better than Tamron 70-300 VC?
This comment was long long time ago, it's not applicable anymore if you have tried the tamron 70-300, VC. It's the new 窮人三宝之一.
|
|
|
|
 |
ykc123
註冊: 2013-03-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 6 月 4 日 |
|
|
This comment was long long time ago, it's not applicable anymore if you have tried the tamron 70-300, VC. It's the new 窮人三宝之一.
what are the other two new 窮人三宝?
|
|
|
|
 |
mluk06
註冊: 2010-02-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 6 月 4 日 |
|
|
The Tamron 70-300, VC replaces the Canon 55-250,is, Mk II.
|
|
|
|
 |
winnlau17
註冊: 2003-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 7 月 4 日 |
|
|
6D可以用Tamron 70-300嗎?
|
|
|
|
 |
soonerorlater
註冊: 2011-07-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 7 月 4 日 |
|
|
6D可以用Tamron 70-300嗎?
Why not!?
|
|
|
|
 |
cookiemerry
註冊: 2004-01-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 7 月 5 日 |
|
|
If buy second hand, try C 70-300 DO usually around $6-7000
PQ very good( similiar to 70-200 F4 L) in the 70-250 range, AF is fast.
Also short and easy to carry around, so small not many people know you are carrying a 300mm Zoom
I have took these test video were taken using the 70--300 DO choose original to see the highest resolution.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSDp-nS9yMo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyU63xMkHjY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N_yxTyi5w8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihMXTsjDIO8
|
|
|
|
 |
mluk06
註冊: 2010-02-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 7 月 5 日 |
|
|
If buy 2nd hand 70-300,DO, why not spend $1000 more to buy the 70-300L ? It's around $8K. At least it is a new product with the red ring.
Besides, it's hard to find a newer DO lens in the 2nd hand market.
|
|
|
|
 |
kennysansan
註冊: 2012-05-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 7 月 5 日 |
|
|
70-300L sharp 過70-300DO 好多
|
|
|
|
 |
hotfire009
註冊: 2008-10-14
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 7 月 6 日 |
|
|
我玩過下列鏡頭,以C384最SHARP,有100分
C70-300L - 90分
TAMRON 70-300 VC - 80分
C70-300 NON L - 70分
Sigma APO 70-300 - 70分
Sigma 70-300 OS - 50分
|
|
|
|
 |
cookiemerry
註冊: 2004-01-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70-300, 邊支好? Post time: 7 月 8 日 |
|
|
Oh 70-300L 2nd hand so cheap now DO also cheaper.
At 300mm range L is much better, but at 70-250mm is not much difference.
One thing I do not like white L lens is it scare people away when you wave it around. the black color of DO have more stealth factor.
|
|
|
|
 |
|