| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
Connieng
註冊: 2007-11-10
上載我的肖像
|
 Canon 鏡頭一問 Post time: 8 月 17 日 |
|
|
|
本人用400D, L鏡價錢太貴, 所以想在28-105f/3.5-105II USM 和28-135mm f3.5-5.6IS USM 中擇其一, 各位有咩意見?
|
|
|
|
 |
MN56
註冊: 2003-10-25
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Canon 鏡頭一問 Post time: 8 月 18 日 |
|
|
|
28-135 IS USM is better but still not cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
yung2
註冊: 2006-03-19
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Canon 鏡頭一問 Post time: 8 月 18 日 |
|
|
要平做乜唔買 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS + EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS ?
又平又唔差得過你揀果兩支.
|
|
|
|
|
Gondola
註冊: 2008-08-13
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Canon 鏡頭一問 Post time: 8 月 18 日 |
|
|
|
55-250 啦 . 平得黎又實用
|
|
|
|
|
alextao1386
註冊: 2006-11-22
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Canon 鏡頭一問 Post time: 8 月 19 日 |
|
|
28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM 有防震會好D~~
另外, 介紹一支 Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6 IS USM, 此鏡用0係妳部400D, 遠近攝都照顧到, 二手一支大約二千幾, 如果買新0既就唔係好抵喇~~
|
|
|
|
|
8856492
註冊: 2008-01-04
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Canon 鏡頭一問 Post time: 8 月 20 日 |
|
|
|
樓上講果支17-85啲色唔掂bo 幾平都冇用啦 樓主兩支鏡我都有 28-105啲相靚啲 但係28-135用能多啲 不過都貴啲 好難揀...
|
|
|
|
|
alextao1386
註冊: 2006-11-22
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Canon 鏡頭一問 Post time: 8 月 21 日 |
|
|
|
哈~~ 要睇錢份上係難揀好多0架喇~~
|
|
|
|
|
onjo3
註冊: 2007-12-09
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: Canon 鏡頭一問 Post time: 8 月 21 日 |
|
|
28mm on 400d not enough wide, it s true
28-105:
-light
-cheap, 900 in 2nd hand market
-58mm filter is more common and cheap(it s u should really to consider)
28-135:
-big, and look strong
-filter size not common, can not share with other canon lenes, only 28--200 and TSE24 is 72mm as my memories.
-it cost 3000 at 2nd hand market
18-55:
-not internal zoom, no good for plastic filters, and not handsome
-105 and 135mm on 400d also enough tele on common shot, 55 just...
if u want wide 1855, but u must not care those plastic feel
if u like look pro and handsome, 28-135
if u like light carrying, cheap , one lens rover, 28-105 is the best, it s cheap
but it s a really good lens, not bad exposure
|
|
|
|
|
| |
