上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
wongsiu1
註冊: 2008-11-04
上載我的肖像
|
55-250 VS 小小白 Post time: 10 月 2 日 |
|
|
To all Ching, I am a new learner, which one is recommended with the consideration of $$ and quality. I use 500d with sigma 18-50 2.8 already.
|
|
|
|
 |
hizaku
註冊: 2004-11-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 55-250 VS 小小白 Post time: 10 月 3 日 |
|
|
55-250 is a perfect choice with limited budget. The photo quality is good. The speed is fast and 窮人USM. A Canon len of HK$1700 with IS. This is only one len that Canon 賣大飽.
If you compare Tamron or Sigma 70-300, you know this Canon len is excellent.
Of course, 小小白 IS is much much much better but it costs you more buck HK$9000,
|
|
|
|
 |
flieger
註冊: 2003-04-17
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 55-250 VS 小小白 Post time: 10 月 3 日 |
|
|
Actually I also have the same question. I was considering 55-250 vs 小小白 (non-IS), as the cost is more affordable. I tried 小小白 once before, it's very heavy. But I just wonder is the photo quality much better than 55-250?
|
|
|
|
 |
wongsiu1
註冊: 2008-11-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 55-250 VS 小小白 Post time: 10 月 3 日 |
|
|
so Flieger ching, u buy 55-250 finally la wor
|
|
|
|
 |
flieger
註冊: 2003-04-17
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 55-250 VS 小小白 Post time: 10 月 3 日 |
|
|
No, I didn't buy either of them. Just played around. Do you have them?
|
|
|
|
 |
tam_dominic
註冊: 2002-10-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 55-250 VS 小小白 Post time: 10 月 3 日 |
|
|
A 2nd hand 55-250 IS costs you only $1,300.-
You may buy a second hand one to play a while and sell it out.
Happy shooting !
|
|
|
|
 |
lck_paul
註冊: 2009-02-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 55-250 VS 小小白 Post time: 10 月 4 日 |
|
|
我用緊40D, 我有支24-105 L F4
但係for 遠拍, 我都買55-250
相quality 好
|
|
|
|
 |
|