[團團圓圓]

用緊Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM鏡頭，覺得效果很好。
想買多支鏡頭出街影景同影人，以下兩支邊支效果好D?

1. Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM
2. Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM
3. 或其他好介紹(最好差唔多價錢)

我之前試過用Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6 IS USM覺得效果比起Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM差D(同一個setting).唔之以上幾款得唔得呢？

Thanks!!!!

[Siu Kat]

我買咗EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM, 不過都幾重手.

[kevin118]

我都買過17-55 f2.8, 不過我岩岩賣左, 換左支24-105 f4
17-55 f2.8係好正...不過太重同蕉段太短..
支鏡成像唔差...真係有L鏡既質數.

但我最後都敵唔過L鏡既吸引力...
遲D買多支16-35 f2.8L

[團團圓圓]

如果用A16同17-55 f2.8比較邊支抵買D呀？價錢差一倍有多，但又驚買左A16後悔，點選擇好呀?

[HelloSRV]

If you want to have brand and quality, you should go to L lens. If you want to have reasonable price and quality, you should go to A16. The quality of both lens are very close and you wouldn't be regreted if you buy A16. The most important thing I guess is whether you can tolerate your lens without red circle while you taking photos among other Ching holding L lens.

[Siu Kat]

To: Kelvin 118

其實之前我都想買買24-105 f4L, 不過唔夠wide, 所以打消念頭,

想請問如果放咗支17-55 改買10-22 + 24-105 f4L, 你話會唔會好傻? (因為新手所以唔知點互相配合)

[kevin118]

我係Kevin唔係Kelvin呀

邊有話傻唔傻...由第一日開始玩相機, 都已經知道會中毒同埋幾敗家既玩意. 其實如果budget許可, 10-22 + 24-105會係一個唔錯既選擇. 我當時換24-105, 都係考慮到呢支鏡可以cover range多d, 好多場合都用到. 其實50mm以下都叫wide鏡. 你要用super wide, 10-22係唔錯既選擇. 不過我就無考慮過買10-22, 因為我等緊新既FF. 所以24-105會係我唔錯既選擇

我諗你想要17-55都係想要大光圈淺景深, 但係24-105 f4.0做出黎既景深都唔差. 因為蕉距都係影響景深既因素之一.

如果唔考慮上FF, 我覺得10-22係唔錯

[Siu Kat]

To Kevin

Sorry ah..!! 明白晒, 多謝你的意見!!