[MineSky]

小弟考慮緊一枝 wide 鏡
唸緊原廠 14-24 2.8定 Tokina 新既 16-28 2.8
睇過 Tokina sample pic 既 PQ 唔成問題

只係想知兩者入光量/口徑既分別，同埋 Tokina 既變型控制如何
話晒兩者差唔多相差一倍價錢，如果入光量同變型控制唔係差好多既話入副廠算。

去鋪頭試Tokina 鏡又好運吉，所以想問下有無師兄用緊/試過
謝謝

[Xplore]

完全無諗過

[lumdicks]

I have got mine T $7,150 and qute atisfied with it. You can check some photos taken with this lens for your own judgement.

http://s1128.photobucket.com/albums/m497/lumdicks/Tokina%2016-28%20Testing/

[lumdicks]

Resend:

I have got mine at $7,150 and qute satisfied with it. You can check some photos taken by me with this lens for your own judgement.

http://s1128.photobucket.com/albums/m497/lumdicks/Tokina%2016-28%20Testing/

[MineSky]

seems its quite good in pq, by the way, some comment on this lens is about the quality of edge is not sharp enough, do you feel the same ?

since your pic is not 100% large cant see clearly ^^"

thanks ~

[lumdicks]

I think it is quite okay. DC Fever has just tested this lens where you can find some 100% sample.

[lumdicks]

Just reviewed by Kenrockwell. Can take it as a reference:

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/16-28mm.htm

[MineSky]

thx for your useful link

睇黎個網既影師覺得 16-35 > 16-28 > 14-24
但我自己覺得 14-24 好過 16-35
可能 14-24 色水最靚，睇佢椰樹張 sample pic 都覺得始終 14-24 色水最現最靚。

網中講到 16-28 有原廠咁 sharp 甚至 sharp 過 14-24 咁勁 !? 搞到真係心郁郁 XD