[WALKALONE]

nikon 16~35 F4 VS nikon 17~35 F2.8 買邊支好的.

各C. HING 指教!!!

[salonsip2005]

16-35 F4 VR 好用又方便

[wah11335]

2.8 好啲 ~!!

[jmD300]

16-35 is new technology - nano coating, much better. VR very useful. F4 is good enough for this range.

[marisalwy]

17-35 is far much better. It has aperture ring, large aperture, better feel with solid construction.

16 - 35 has no aperture ring, small aperture, much "plastic" feel

[winnwong]

1424 vs 1735 --------> 1424
為方便的話 ---------> 1635, 我唔覺會差過1735好多囉, tokina都出咗枝2.8 ge wide lens for ff, 但我就唔知啲口卑了, 你又可查吓

[PP518]

TOKINA 嗰支算把啦! 支鏡個售價唔平, 要成8K, 仲要前面無得加FILTER, 我寧願買返原廠N16-35好過, 價錢差唔多, 有NANO COATING + VR

[winnwong]

pp: 好的提醒!!

[FreeMiLk]

我寧願搵支tamron 或 二代 sigma 1735....
支16-35 咁嘅性價比真係低到。。

[CindyLok926]

16-35mm的性價比低，是跟副廠鏡比吧。如有原廠情意結，16-35mm算是最好的選擇，因為17-35mm甚至DX的17-55mm都比他貴。

[marisalwy]

17 - 35 has aperture ring, large aperture, better feel with solid construction

[FreeMiLk]

當然講跟同副廠比。。但當副廠又sharp過你，有平過你。。我真係唸唔名仲有咩情意結。。不如講話攞支副廠出黎無咁好睇啦。

[PP518]

想問問邊支副廠比16-35 sharp呢?

[jmD300]

想問問邊支副廠比16-35 sharp呢?
..................................................
there is none. also photo colors are not as good.

[veryoldcat]

我會買n1635vr,除同廠n1424比n1635vr sharp,仲有邊支副廠sharp?我都想知。