[catcat219]

很多Ching都說17-55 f/2.8多好,但到底有幾多Ching真的擁有Canon 17-55 f/2.8還是只作推介,事實上,這支的價錢跟龍仔的17-50 f/2.8 VC,貴了一倍(以一手計),如沒有VC,更超過一倍,跟sigma的17-50 f/2.8 OS HSM也貴了一大段,是否真是物有所值?

[chriswong324]

我無

[wesleyyau]

以前用A16...依家有呢支鏡... 有IS 同USM 係好用好多...

[wesleyyau]

唔計我自己有4個friend 用緊....

[ERICT]

我之前有，轉用5D 及SIGMA 24-70 HSM 之後才賣走，
賣走之前長插50D。

[mluk06]

晤值, 賣左! PQ 同17-40差不多.只係光圈大左. 防振晤多覺特出.15-85 好過佢.

[gwu1]

１７﹣５５f２．８IS係好正既鏡。不過值唔值個價錢，個個人都有唔同意見。我覺得值。其他鏡比唔到一樣既效果同埋功能，比較唔到。

[bae146]

１７﹣５５ F２．８ IS 好正 ,17-40mm比唔到一樣既效果同埋功能所以賣出。

[catcat219]

其實很多CHing都把它跟24-70 f/2.8或是24-105 f/4來比,有些說比24-70更好,可惜不是L鏡(因是EF-S的關係),不過,不明白Canon為合不出一支Wide一些,像15-85的焦段,要知道17mm用在APS-C,是等於27mm,55mm就等於88mm,即27-88,那跟24-70用在FF,wide段便差了3mm,要知道,在wide段,3mm是很明顯的,所以我建議Canon應出一支15-85 f/2.8(即24-136)或是15-55 f/2.8(24-88),考慮一下影wide一些,那就perfect.
各位Ching覺得對嗎?

[wllui]

15-85幾正我就唔知, 17-40幾正我又唔知
一但插入17-55, 好難番轉頭, f/2.8 及 is 兩技鏡分別都俾唔到你
真係好睇個人影咩多, 好老實講, 色水只屬中上, 室外一般啦, 但一入室內, 恆定2.8加is就好幫到手, 一zoom埋去有d鏡收到成5.6, 就係呢兩級光圏決定你能否拍到清晰的影像

如果影景多, 15-85 就夠, 人多17-55好dd, 副廠都唔差, b005 及 s記都唔錯
只係我想用埋暗角收正功能

[skydogs]

17-55 f/2.8真係唔多值,出得呢個價不如買紅圈鏡.

[wllui]

canon係好識做生意
aps-c, 又要有返wide段, 又要恆定2.8, 又要有is, 紅圏又冇齊呢d優點, 又要識變焦, 其實焗住要買佢
或許外表做工不值, 但用料其實都幾足, 只係近來日元強到死, 以前1000日元兌6港元, 現在1000日元兌8.8港元, 升得咁勁才令支鏡由六千中升至七千尾, 看來美元仲有排弱, 現在唯有涯貴鏡

[hanny]

main prime for aps-c
very good

i try 15~85 before but the pq i still feel 17~55 f2.8 is better

[h0001244]

For the standard zoom range, this is the only one which has IS, F2.8 and USM
"No such lens in FF.........."

I find this lens worth under
Moving objects ----> you need USM
Indoor or low light ---> you need 2.8
Indoor with ambient light ----> you need IS for 1/20-1/60s

IS + F2.8 + USM is very usable for snaps especially for wedding events, for people, for indoor, low light condition, with bounce flash and ambient light, ceremony............

[mobile_shop2]

真係好多朋友都常用le支17-55 f2.8, 真係色彩好正~~