[BTsang]

急急！！！Canon 500D 近攝濾鏡 vs Kenko 近攝環

不夠錢買微距鏡，相買Canon 500D 近攝濾鏡。
請問有無師兄用過 Canon 500D近攝濾鏡？用於70-300mm影微距不知質數如何？問過成成和肥花都無！唔知邊度有得買？價錢約多少？是否買 77mm較化算 (本人有 68mm、72mm、77mm的鏡頭) ？

最後，Canon 500D 近攝濾鏡 vs Kenko 近攝環，那一個質數較佳？希望各位師兄不吝賜教。最好post D相給小弟分享一下。謝謝！

[wllui]

自己看吧
http://home.netvigator.com/~dummytoby/essay/macro.htm

[_kimkiu]

for PQ, Kenko > reverse mount > 近攝濾鏡

for $$$ Kenko > 近攝濾鏡 > reverse mount

i suggest you try reverse mount first

some info is here:
http://www.digital-photography-school.com/reverse-mounting-your-prime-lenses-for-affordable-macro-photography

[h0001244]

Depend on what subject you are about to take

1. insect
2. flower
3. in-depth details

For 1, I suggest not to use reverse mount as insect will move, it's hard to focus. And focus distance is quite short, you may scare away the insect. Macro filter 500D is okay.
For 3, Reverse mount can give you larger than 1:1 magnification, even better than macro lens.

The effect of Kenko extension tube on long lens is not significant. Short lens would be more significant. 1/f= 1/(u+24mm)+1/v

[_kimkiu]

h0001244 ching is right too!

[_kimkiu]

i've try all of them, now i'm shooting with kenko tubes +c180

BTsang ching, welcome to macro world! it's got so much fun ^^

[h0001244]

Sample of In-depth details

Now take out your wallet

Take out a piece of $100 (HSBC one)

Turnover it to the back

Can you see which part is this?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

[h0001244]

this photo is by 17-85mm @ 17mm

[h0001244]

And sometimes, even 35 F2 can surprise you if you use external flash together to make it looks more 3D

[BTsang]

資料很詳細！
謝謝各位師兄！