9 月 21 日 (星期日) | 會員登記|會員中心
Canon 單反討論區
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1共 5 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

Canon Ball




註冊: 2008-07-19

上載我的肖像
題目Anybody try the Canon extender 2x II before???     Post time: 10 月 2 日

Currently holding a 70-200mm f/2.8L with 40D body.
Needed to have more zoom power for taking birds photos.
With this extender I can have 400mm zoom but reduced the f-stop to f/5.6.
The extender cost around $2200. Please advise C-hing and let me know is it a good investment?
Back to top

gwu1




註冊: 2007-09-26

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Anybody try the Canon extender 2x II before???     Post time: 10 月 2 日

I tried 1.4x on 70-200 f4L IS and 40D. Not sharp enough at wide open.

100-400 is better than the above combination.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Canon Ball




註冊: 2008-07-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Anybody try the Canon extender 2x II before???     Post time: 10 月 2 日

Finally, I found the related information.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/400v400.shtml
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

老叟




註冊: 2003-04-22

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Anybody try the Canon extender 2x II before???     Post time: 10 月 4 日

I use this X2 extender for wildlife, not bad at all
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

gwu1




註冊: 2007-09-26

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Anybody try the Canon extender 2x II before???     Post time: 10 月 4 日

Canon Ball,

Thanks for the link. This is similar to what I have found with my 70-200 F4L and 1.4x. 100-400 is really great even at 400mm and wide open at f5.6.

see
Photobucket
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

variosonnar




註冊: 2005-01-16

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Anybody try the Canon extender 2x II before???     Post time: 10 月 4 日

2x doesn't work well with L zoom lenses. It's a far better match for the super tele L primes (e.g. 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8... etc)
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1共 5 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: