| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
50D
註冊: 2009-04-25
上載我的肖像
|
 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 20 日 |
|
|
我見canon site 介紹60 marco 影人像(但又好似無乜人提過呢支鏡，可能EF-S啦...)，有無師兄用過呢...定係50 1.4 較好呢...影小孩？
我用50D...THANKS
P.S.
|
|
|
|
 |
50D
註冊: 2009-04-25
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 20 日 |
|
|
|
P.S. i will not choose 50 1.2L...budget problem...I am waiting for 24-70
|
|
|
|
|
jsklee
註冊: 2002-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 20 日 |
|
|
|
how old is your child?
|
|
|
|
|
50D
註冊: 2009-04-25
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 20 日 |
|
|
|
below 2
|
|
|
|
|
jsklee
註冊: 2002-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 21 日 |
|
|
50 x 1.6 = 80
60 x 1.6 = 96
I think 50mm is better for taking photos with child less than 2 years from the angle point of view.
|
|
|
|
|
50D
註冊: 2009-04-25
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 21 日 |
|
|
|
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 21 日 |
|
|
|
如果你唔閃，2.8會窄窄地
|
|
|
|
|
jsklee
註冊: 2002-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 21 日 |
|
|
you can find some reviews in google:
http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=zh-TW&safe=off&q=canon+60%2F2.8+review&meta=&aq=f&oq=
such as:
http://photo.net/equipment/canon/60-macro
"The barrel is all-plastic, but durable, with weight and length slightly larger than the Canon 50/1.4."
"If you don't mind extra weight or are thinking of upgrading to a full-frame camera in the future, the strongest alternative is the Sigma 70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Lens for Canon, $499. This is a full-frame coverage lens that Popular Photography tested right after the Canon EF-S 60 and the image quality results were even better. The main drawback of the Sigma is increased weight: 525g (18.5 oz) versus the 335 g (11.8 oz) for the Canon."
"I thought I would see a huge difference between this and my 50/1.4, but I havent. What IS wonderful about this lens is the bokeh - up close shots have a liquidy background that I, personally, love."
For resolution comparison, pls refer to this link:
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=335&Camera=474&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=115&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=4
It seems to me that resolution of 50/1.4 is sharper in most of the aperture ranges.
|
|
|
|
|
50D
註冊: 2009-04-25
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 21 日 |
|
|
|
thanks again all chings!
|
|
|
|
|
lmichael
註冊: 2003-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 21 日 |
|
|
|
不如sigma 35 F1.4, 佢室內可以用到F1.4,唔駛用閃燈.
|
|
|
|
|
jsklee
註冊: 2002-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 22 日 |
|
|
http://www.whichlens.com/index.php?blog=5&title=sigma_30mm_ex_dc_f1_4_vs_canon_ef_35mm_f&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
but sigma 35/1.4 is for non-FF camera only
|
|
|
|
|
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 22 日 |
|
|
lmichael & jsklee 請分享下支 sigma 35 F1.4
我從來唔知 Sigma 有 35/1.4
ps.我只知 Canon 有35/1.4 (FF)，Sigma 有 30/1.4 (APS-C)
|
|
|
|
|
50D
註冊: 2009-04-25
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 22 日 |
|
|
其實...24-70 一支...定係...24-105 +50 1.4 呢？
新考慮....around 10K
|
|
|
|
|
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 23 日 |
|
|
I prefer 24-105 +50 1.4 wor
講大光圈就2.8都唔夠，不如24-105 +50 1.4
|
|
|
|
|
allen000
註冊: 2009-04-03
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Marco Post time: 5 月 26 日 |
|
|
50/1.4 too soft wide open ... you'll have to stop down to F2.8 to get center sharpness ... F2 if you can accept a little dreamy ...
AF is actually slower than 50/1.8 II
EF-S lenses not worth investing into ... you cannot use it on full-frames when you upgrade
IMHO, 85/1.8 is a better bet ... fast AF, acceptable center sharpness wide open; = 136mm on APS-C
|
|
|
|
|
| |
