[fionchanyw]

多謝指教!

[KuCool]

想價錢平...Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II 唔錯.
追求完美, 又唔介意錢.....EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM.

[petercyc]

Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 which match your body according to the price

[alextao1386]

Canon 70-200 f/2.8L USM (IS or non IS) / Canon 70-200 f/4L IS USM~~

Canon EF 100 f/2.8 Marco USM 又可以影人, 又可影花草昆蟲~~

Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 做工比 50 f/1.4 USM 紮實, 真正USM, 內對焦~~

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, 平平0地都夠玩, 係當佢係f/2.8鏡用就比較滿意~~

其實仲有其他鏡頭選擇~~
樓主你都係去老尖Canon, 用自己對眼去試真D先好買, 人人唔同口味嘛~~

[zeater]

EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM L
EF 24-70 f/2.8 USM L

That's right, as alextao1386 c-hing said, goto canon show room to test the lens. Bring your own CF card such that you can bring the photos back to home and review it in details.

Address:
11/F 26 Nathan Road,
Tsim Sha Tsui
Monday to Friday: 10 am - 8 pm
Saturday: 11am - 7 pm
(Except public holiday)
Tel: 3191 2333

[Windsurfer]

Canon showroom should open to 7PM (Monday to Friday).

[Obi-Wan]

Canon 450 + 50/1.8 影人像 ------ 平, 靚, 正!

If more $ add Tamron 90/2.8 (below 3k) or Canon 100/2.8 macro (below 4k water good) ---- 有好淺的景深@2.8

I don't think attaching a big pro lens such as EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM L on 450D a good balance ---- 太頭重尾輕了

[zeater]

I see, I see. I may wrongly copy the office hr for customer service. Sorry about that.

Should be below?
Address:
10/F 26 Nathan Road, TST

Monday to Sun, 11 am to 7 pm
(Except public holiday)


http://www.canon.com.hk/tc/support/home/default.aspx

[alextao1386]

我分享一下我用過EF50 1.8, EF 50 1.4, 同埋 EF 85 1.8 0既經歷~~

三支鏡, 最近似L鏡顏色0既就係50 1.8, 光圈2.8以上就比較sharp, 平靚正~~

之後因為心理因素, 同埋有好多師兄都話好正, 就買0左支50 1.4, 結果好失望, 鏡身結構基本上同50 1.8冇咩分別, 唔係內對焦, 感覺支鏡好易壞; 光圈1.4似乎有D扼人, 因為實在好化, 我意思係主體好化, 咁樣當然散景都好化啦, 起碼要開到2.5先叫做好D, 既然1.4成像咁差, 點解鑑硬保留1.4就出呢支所謂大光圈鏡頭? 實在名過於實, 還有影出0黎顏色好怪, 或者係唔0岩我心水掛; 理解佢只係賣二千幾蚊0既鏡, 唔可以太高要求; 最後終於頂唔順, 唔夠兩個月就賣0左佢喇~~

以非L鏡之人像鏡頭之中, 85 1.8係暫時最滿意0既一支, 真正內對焦, 1.8係可用光圈, 顏色同層次分明; 我影人主要係用 EF 70-200 f/4L IS USM 影大頭同半身, 用85 1.8 就影大半身同全身, 彌補70-200 f/4 散景唔夠淺之不足~~

總結, 選擇鏡頭, 一定要信自己對眼, 我之前就係0係肥花0既用家心得參考好多師兄0既意見, 先決定買50 1.4, 結果......唉~~ 其實我0係其他外地攝影網站都有其他師兄都俾0左好多忠告; 不過二手賣0番出去都係蝕幾百0者, 只係行0左好多冤枉路0者~~ 當然理解用L鏡會滿意D, 但係咁貴唔係人人玩得起啦~~

[fionchanyw]

實左獲益良多! 多謝 閣位!

[iso_ray]

真係各人有各人所好, 我覺得支50.4十分掂, 同等光圈下, 銳利比美L鏡, 就算用1.4都一樣交足功課, 咁大光圈, 又距離主體近就肯定化啦, 係層次上唔夠50.2比之外, 真係無野好投訴, 50.8實在係幾慢, 影大人就唔怕, 小朋友都幾頭痕.

85.8係一支相當好鏡頭, 室外無得頂, 室內crop機可能無咩位走.

[cbaauyeung]

I am using 85mm f/1.8. Colour and sharpness is good enough even under f/1.8. The outstanding part is that background is blurred very naturally.

Considering the price and the quality, this lens is a very good choice.

[gwu1]

50mm f1.4 影出黎嘅顏色好靚。

[canonw]

50mm 1.8 is only $600-$800...
but who know where have stock now?

And use canon 40d,50d......is 1.6x? no 50mm?

[power1986hk]

借post一問....Sigma AF 50mm f/1.4會唔會比canon個支好?