[o45699]

細佬用緊30D,現有一支EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
如題想入支長火,各位師兄有咩諗法??

Option 1:
放咗支EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM然後入
EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM($17,200)

Option 2:
直接入支EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM($11,580)

2個option其實都係要使咁多錢,但係真係唔知入邊支好???
或者有冇師兄係用緊呢2支鏡頭,佢地又有咩好同唔好呢???
我只係知呢2支鏡頭都係推拉式設計,咁其實算好定唔好呢???

[老叟]

梗係後者啦,105係中火,唔係長火

[JSmith]

唔要支24-105？下下都抬住碌炮？

[gwu1]

梗係選擇２，多啲彈性，同埋個焦距去到４００ｍｍ．

[calwkf]

放左枝 24-105？咩價錢呀 ching？我岩岩想買喎!!

但係你放左枝 24-105 仲有冇中距鏡先？
如果冇, 就當然係 28-300 啦..

[Obi-Wan]

放咗支EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM然後入
EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM($17,200)+EFS 10-22 ($4XXX)

[kw7559]

Option 2:
直接入支EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

[panerai]

100-400/4.5-5.6L IS FOR SURE !!!



by 100-400/4.5-5.6L IS

[afriwong]

一定係Option 2，我自己都有支100-400，Zoom到勁遠，好好玩，但真係勁重，如果任何時間都用咁重的鏡，重死都得，所以平日我都係用24-105，舒服好多，推拉係會有塵，冇得避，但好似話唔會影響成像，所以冇咩所謂，不過心理上有少少唔開心，不過Zoom到咁遠，真係冇其他Range可以做到…仲要唔算太貴，當然都唔平啦﹗

[JSmith]

推拉先至冇塵，好似個pump咁，吹走晒啲塵呀~

[Canon Ball]

Option 2:
I was thinking about the same thing, option 2 is more functional and the street price now is $11200 to $11500. Nowadays, there is none L zoom Len can have 100-400mm zoom and it is a great investment (great quality). By the way, don't worry about the dust issue. Just take care of your Len after you finish. Also make sure you have the use of the Len, because a lot of my friends always left the Len in the dry box.
I highly recommend Canon EF 100-400mm L.

[o45699]

明白哂啦!!!感激咁多位師兄出手指點!!!
細佬綜合咗咁多位師兄ge意見...
唔使諗都一定係option2啦!!!
再一次多謝各位師兄指教!!!