上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
alexng914
註冊: 2008-08-14
上載我的肖像
|
Sigma 17-70, 18-200 or tarmon A16 betterfor new user ??? Post time: 8 月 14 日 |
|
|
Sigma 17-70, 18-200 or tarmon A16 betterfor new user to buy the first lens???
|
|
|
|
 |
petercyc
註冊: 2003-11-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Sigma 17-70, 18-200 or tarmon A16 betterfor new user ??? Post time: 8 月 14 日 |
|
|
A16 , 我都有支, 2.8光圈好有用
|
|
|
|
 |
alexng914
註冊: 2008-08-14
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Sigma 17-70, 18-200 or tarmon A16 betterfor new user ??? Post time: 8 月 14 日 |
|
|
A16 better than 18-200 in sigma and tarmon???
|
|
|
|
 |
petercyc
註冊: 2003-11-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Sigma 17-70, 18-200 or tarmon A16 betterfor new user ??? Post time: 8 月 14 日 |
|
|
A16 is Tamron
According to pq, of cause YES
According to the range, of cuase NO
for me, A16 for both portrait (exclude head shoot) and lanscape is good
Depends on you
|
|
|
|
 |
noordin
註冊: 2005-08-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Sigma 17-70, 18-200 or tarmon A16 betterfor new user ??? Post time: 8 月 20 日 |
|
|
It depend on your choice, for quality A16 is the best, others better is range. A16 is my choice. If you do not have budget conern, you may get 2 Lens, canon 17-40L and 70-300 Is USM can cover most of range and got better quality.
|
|
|
|
 |
Windsurfer
註冊: 2008-05-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Sigma 17-70, 18-200 or tarmon A16 betterfor new user ??? Post time: 8 月 20 日 |
|
|
A16 with F2.8, so it is a good choice for replace kit lens.
|
|
|
|
 |
|